Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only.
A glance at people’s attitude toward success brings to the light a question that has been asked several times, namely, whether focusing on one skill lead us to achieve our goals or obtaining various skillsets. Although most of my colleagues believe that specialization in one field has a better chance of success, I, as a graduate business student, assert that today, without understanding different subjects, a person cannot be competent and well-known in science and technology majors.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that nobody can draw borders around sciences’ topics and make them separate from each other. To be more specific, despite different names, the world of physics is not distinct from mathematics, so we cannot comprehend physics concepts without contemplating math equations thoroughly. All universities require students to take various courses to equip students with the most recent knowledge and information, which ensures their success. Therefore, it is a better method to learn as much as possible, regardless of the topic.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that the future world is unknown to everybody and nobody can predict which major will become popular in the next 20 years. A decade ago, scientists thought optic and molecular technology could change the face of the world, so most students worked hard to get admission from top-ranked universities and get a decent academic job, while now, it is crystal clear that most companies hire applicants who are experts at computer science and business. If a person wants to prepare himself for unpredictable situations, it is critical to gain information about different subjects rather than one. Hence, successful people are ready to increase their knowledge in diverse areas.
Admittedly, if a person wants to be proficient in one field, he must allocate most of his time to it, without changing his major frequently. However, it does not mean the person must not learn new ideas and broaden his horizon. Bill Gates, who established Microsoft company, which is a reputable business in the computer field, always mentions this notion that for being successful, 70% of your time should be spent on your specialized major, and the rest must be devoted to other related subjects. In fact, neither sacrifice your first major, nor the related topics, and set priority for yourself.
Due to the aforementioned argument in the previous statements, I highly recommend students to take various courses and learn all of them perfectly to get good outcomes. If they want to find their dream jobs, they should be aware that knowledge is a weapon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-08 | JoeyRussell07 | 90 | view |
- Many students choose to attend schools or universities outside their home countries. Why do some students study abroad? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 90
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ear that most companies hire applicants who are experts at computer science and busines...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16859122402 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79856549125 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605080831409 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7329846985 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.875 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0625 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120821446156 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350673029745 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043554222122 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623971522893 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052086602565 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.