Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge
of the subject being taught.
I remember every teacher that has taught me since I was in Kindergarten. If a friend wants to
know who our first grade teacher was in elementary school, all they have to do is ask me. The
teachers all looked very kind and understanding in my eyes as a child. They had special
relationships with nearly each and every one of the students and were very nice to everyone.
That’s the reason I remember all of them.
A teacher’s primary goal is to teach students the best they can about the things that are in our
textbooks and more important, how to show respect for one another. They teach us how to live a
better life by getting along with everyone. In order to do that, the teachers themselves have to be
able to relate well with students.
My parents are teachers too. One teaches Plant Biology and one teaches English, but that’s not
the reason I’m calling them “teachers.” They are teachers beacuse they teach me how to act in
special situations and how to cooperate with others. I have a brother, and my parents use
different aproaches when teaching us. They might scold my brother for surfing the internet too
long because he doesn’t have much self-control and they need to restrain him. He almost never
studies on his own and is always either drawing, playing computer games, or reading. On the
other hand, they never tell me off for using the computer too long. I do my own work when I
want and need to because that brings me the best results and my parents understand that. They
know that I need leisure time of my own and that I’ll only play until needed. My parents’ ability
to relate well with my brother and I allows them to teach, not just the subject they teach but also
their excellent knowledge on life.
Knowlegde of the subject being taught is something taken for granted, but at the same time,
secondary. One must go through and pass a series of courses and tests in order to become a
teacher. Any teacher is able to have excellent knowledge of their subject but not all teachers can
have the ability to relate well with students.
A teacher’s primary goal is to teach students the best they can about how to show respect for one
another, so teachers use different approaches when teaching, and knowledge of the subjet being
taught is secondary. For these reasons, I claim with confidence that excellent knowledge of the
subject being taught is secondary to the teacher’s ability to relate well with their students.
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 50
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 66
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 73
- cooperation & competition 16
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
... had special relationships with nearly each and every one of the students and were very nice to e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 38, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'allow'
Suggestion: allow
...y to relate well with my brother and I allows them to teach, not just the subject the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, well, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73455377574 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5303047803 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45995423341 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5577966279 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0454545455 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 28.0 4.53405017921 618% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272001916959 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922056450228 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111000613262 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927478309811 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988842464415 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.