Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge
of the subject being taught
Nowadays, the education process around the globe has changed noticeably. The interactive lessons and many other class activities have reshaped the teacher's rule in the classroom. Some people believe that the most important criterion in teaching is the relationship between students and teachers. However, I believe that knowledge and experience are the most crucial in the teaching process. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, a teacher with an excellent knowledge is more capable of explaining the concepts and the course in general. A better understanding of a specific subject makes an individual the best teacher. Moreover, a teacher who knows every detail of a specific subject can elaborate on it most easily. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. I took a fluid mechanics course in my third in the university. Fluid mechanics is considered one of the toughest courses in the engineering field. However, my professor was specialized in fluid mechanics, and he used to teach this course for about twenty years. Consequently, I did not face any problem, and actually, this course was one of the easiest subjects in the university. All in all, a lecturer with excellent knowledge and experience makes courses seem easier.
Furthermore, a teacher with perfect knowledge always encourages students to think creatively. Creative thinking always comes after a better understanding of the subject. According to psychology, artistic thinking usually comes after a comprehensive understanding of the subject. For instance, during the fluid mechanic classes, the professor encouraged us to think about the physical meanings of Navier stokes law and other mechanic equations. He encouraged us to think outside the box and away from mathematical meanings. This way of teaching gave us a better understanding and taught us a lot of details.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teacher with experience and knowledge is better than a teacher who can relate well with students.
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 3
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Broccoli is a vegetable that is popular throughout the United States but it can be grown only in temperate climates with mild summers Because of this limitation 90 percent of the broccoli consumed in the United States is grown in the cooler regions of Cal 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. To begin with, a teacher with an excelle...
^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erstanding of the subject. For instance, during the fluid mechanic classes, the p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36111111111 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07567729278 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524691358025 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0836243118 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.7142857143 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23519065691 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655222954454 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892880873876 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157753511505 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948181269968 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.