Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
I agree with the statement that it is more important for the teacher to relate with her students than have excellent knowledge of the subject. I think this for the following three reasons.
First of all, if the teacher couldn’t understand the students’ doubts then how will she be able to help them understand the subject of which she has excellent knowledge. I would like to given an example from my own personal experience. My pharmacology professor has done a lot of research on respiratory diseases and has abundant knowledge on the subject. Despite her proficiency in the field, she couldn’t explain the pathophysiology of respiratory diseases well. She couldn’t understand my doubts on the topic and eventually, I had to give up. You see, her excessive knowledge of the subject matter couldn’t help me clear my doubts as she couldn’t relate to my queries.
Furthermore, I think that if a teacher relates well with her students then it will help them to grasp the subject knowledge better. This is because when a teacher relates with her student, she would better understand what problems and queries the student is facing towards a particular topic. This way she can know how to help them to get the concepts clear. For example, if a student mixes up between two seemingly closely related yet completely different theories, a teacher who could relate to the student’s confusion will make sure that she outlines the similarities and differences between the two theories in the class. On the other hand, if a teacher with abundant knowledge of the theories, but couldn’t relate to the student’s confusion, will not be able to help clear the student’s confusion no matter how hard she tries.
Lastly, if a teacher could relate with the students better, then it might make them more comfortable with the teacher. In fact, they will not hesitate to ask her doubts or queries because the teacher gets them so well. Also, it will promote the students to participate actively in the class lectures because they could understand the topic better.
To sum up, it is more important for the teachers to relate and understand the students’ confusion and problems on a subject rather than the in-depth knowledge on the subject being taught.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 58
- The expression never never give up means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, so, then, well, for example, i think, in fact, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01856763926 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8240531124 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440318302387 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.070071752 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.294117647 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379095307512 0.236089414692 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140620086239 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1521953125 0.0737576698707 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275897282689 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130869757525 0.0645574589148 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.