Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Undoubtedly, one of the hardest careers around the world is teaching. Teachers spend most of their time thinking about how to increase efficiency of their teaching methods in order to have more knowledgeable students. Although each teacher, as well as other people, has special characteristic which may directly affect to their students, many teachers want to know whether they allow themselves to make social or political views known to their students or not. I personally concur with sharing points of view about with students by teachers. In what follows, I will delve into couple of reasons to shed light on my response.

First reason that comes into my mind is that teachers can act as guide-man for their students. In general, a teacher has allocated most of his/her time on increasing their academic knowledge. It results in having more time to study and learn many aspects of life. The more the studying time, the more the awareness about current world-wide situations. Since teachers have more information than the students, they can be more reliable guide-man for these unexperienced people who want to have better future lives. The most essential aspects of lives which teachers can help students in, are social and political. As I remember, having entered to my new school, one of our teachers spent most of the class's time to talk about how we should act during a conversation in the whole society. He enlisted different ideas, containing his own one, on the board and started to tell the advantages and disadvantages of each one. Eventually, he approved us that his own point of view was the best one, and helped us to practice it besides our other behaviors. Never did I forget how he helped us a really kind guide-man.

Second, should teacher make their social or political views known to students, enhancing children's decision-making skills counts as an essential factor in order to have a developed society. By and large, whether students like this phenomenon or not, they should make decision in each period of their life, such as elections. Prerequisite of a good decision is having reliable information; however, students spend most of their time on schools or universities. Thus, they cannot get access to a trustful information source, except their teachers. Teachers should have some speeches about all possible decision-making processes of student in their future, if teachers want to have better society, owing to the fact that students are the next generation which will be involved and make important decisions in the whole society; two regions which teachers can help students are issues related to society and politics, that it is really hard for students to find reliable information source about them. Again, on those days, my classmates and I had to participate in election in the following year. Since we were not aware of each representative’s political view, our teacher spent significant time in order to make us know about politics. Having talked with my father about it, I found my father asking from our teacher about his purpose of these speeches. To sum it up, the main purpose of him was to have a better developed society with enhancing our political view, which we had really needed to vote.
To recapitulate, we can conclude that teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. It is because being aware of teachers’ points of view about these two regions not only benefits students with having a guide-man close to them but also, helps the whole society to have better future generations. I strongly propose that teachers should be allowed to share their private points of view in these two specific regions

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, thus, well, as to, in general, such as, as well as, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 101.0 52.1666666667 194% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3101.0 1977.66487455 157% => OK
No of words: 614.0 407.700716846 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05048859935 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.977853291 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79495009136 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459283387622 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 951.3 618.680645161 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7279261096 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.851851852 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7407407407 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262874088723 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837040929408 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857033629494 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202640688162 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727277853195 0.0645574589148 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.