Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Being a teacher is one of the most ancient jobs since the development of language. Nevertheless, teachers are less and less valued by the societies. I feel this way because of two main reasons, which I explain in the following essay. 

In today's modern world, there are lots of ways for anybody to learn new skills and broaden their knowledge. For example, almost all students have access to the internet and also the websites like youtube wherein there are many educational channels and videos. Therefore, some students may find no reason to appreciate their teacher. This is in contrast to the past when teachers were main persons who could teach us the essential knowledge and accordingly they were valued by students and society in general. It is noteworthy that similar argument can also be applied for the teachers, namely, they face less difficulty to prepare their educational materials. This is because they can use lots of resources on the internet about the syllabus they are going to teach, and broadly speaking, teaching has been much easier than the past. Therefore, some people may argue that it is natural if teachers are less valued by the society.

Secondly, nowadays there are lots of high powered jobs which are more demanding than being a teacher. These jobs usually are desirable and prestigious because by doing them one can make more money. For example, a CTO or a manager usually make significantly more money than a teacher. Consequently, as people are used to evaluate the value of a job by how much money one can earn from it, they have started to believe that teaching is not a high ranked jab. This, by itself lead to the fact that teachers are less valued by society than the past.   

To conclude, with all these arguments taken into account, personally I think that teachers are less appreciated than the past. This is mainly because of the spreadity of online courses and educational materials.  

Votes
Average: 8.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-15 mazenghonem 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Nafis :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &nbsp
...he development of language. Nevertheless, teachers are less and less valued by th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 766, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &nbsp
...out the syllabus they are going to teach, and broadly speaking, teaching has...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &nbsp
...oing to teach, and broadly speaking, teaching has been much easier than the ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...anding than being a teacher. These jobs usually are desirable and prestigious bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, broadly speaking, for example, i feel, i think, in contrast, in general, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13271604938 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54705237511 2.67179642975 133% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9731483454 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7333333333 5.45110844103 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218145927427 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768309317109 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580615269019 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131661106115 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403206896305 0.0645574589148 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.