Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has.
Living in such a world undergoing constant changes, we enjoy the convenient and colorful lives thanks to the advance of various technology devices. Some argue that telephones gain a upper hand compared with televisions. It may seem reasonable at first glance, whereas you will find it is the television that is of more vital necessity if having a closer look.
Admittedly, telephones facilitate our lives somewhat, because of the function of communication. For example, if I and my teammates would like to have a discussion at a rainy night, it is undoubtedly inconvenient for us to gather together face to face. Yet, it is the telephone that resolves this problem and instructs us with long-distance communication possibility. However, it is obvious that telephones only serve as a commutation tool and it is not an all-cured solution because people only have access to hear others voice as opposed to faces. Imagine a television, you can realize that there are increasing numbers of elites who are researching and developing long-distance communication functions, through which people can not only listen to others' voice, but also see their faces, realizing their emotion and condition more accurately.
Besides, the television has found its way into every family. This is because as the elevation of technology and the increasing of income of commuters, televisions are a lot easily available among families. The other reason is that TV programs are accessible to everyone, even those without tertiary education background. Thus, it is not uncommon to see the appearance of many couch potatoes. For example, children are appealed to animations on TV with vivid pictures and lively shots. Moreover, adults prefer watching TV in order to temporarily escape from the heavy loads of exhausting works. In addition, it is not hard to imagine an old loner enjoy watching TV to kill time.
Not only do televisions are available among people's lives, but they also dominate ones' leisure time. For instance, numerous youngsters have their own idols and consume a great quantity of time to pursue them. Especially during this period that diverse variety shows and quiz shows overrun in China, there are growing number of actors and actresses who are enjoying great popularity among fans thanks to such TV shows. These fans to a great extent are made of youngsters who spend too much time and energy not only watching such TV shows but also pursuing their idols and hence are distracted from their school works.
All in all, it is apparent that TVs influence people's lives more greatly, since they are easily accessible and occupy people's leisure time.
- TPO48W1 71
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best 1 help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics 2 help people who cannot afford to build or 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people today are more likely to help others than young people were in the past. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Patience is usually not a good strategy We should take action now rather than later 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement It is better to finish a project completely and then do another project than do two or more projects at the same time 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...evices. Some argue that telephones gain a upper hand compared with televisions. I...
^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssible and occupy peoples leisure time.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2226.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16473317865 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82205541202 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568445475638 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 717.3 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1103211749 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.3 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150726656783 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449711720408 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423551965752 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892905676696 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03727456505 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.