The impact that telephone and television have had on our daily life, and society in general, is undeniable. No doubt it will become even greater as the scope of which continues to grow, and as the relevant technologies become more and more sophisticated, and so convenient that virtually nobody will be able to escape. Some people believe that telephone has greater influence on people's lives than television has. However, it's a little bit haste to say that telephone is more influential than television, or vice versa.
Television is as much a part of our lives as are our meals, work, or school. When people go back home after a whole day work or study, they open television and relax themselves on sofa. Or they enjoy news and obtain the lastest information from television when eating breakfast. Moreover, since some TV channels broadcast educational programmes, it could help parents cultivate their offsprings. Obviously, telephone cannot transport such kind of information, especially in video forms.
However, because of the characteristic of telephone, two people can communicate with each other simultaneously no matter how far the distance is. Telephone provide a novel avenue to link family members, friends, and even the whole world. In the past, we had to use mails to chat with others in the distance, which made us consume a long time to receive letters. Fortunately, as the technology is rapidly developing, everyone could reap the benefits of telephone and it becomes to some extent an indispensable factor in daily lives. Without telephone, it hard for modern people to imagine how to communicate with others. Apparently, one deficiency of television is the fact that people can reveice information from television but cannot send information via television.
Not only is telephone critical to our lives but television also has dramatic positive impact on our lives, both of which permanently change the way how we get information. We witnessed terrorism attack in Paris, Brexit, Brazilan forest fire, Australian forest fire, and other crucial events in the world, wherever we were at that time, only if we can watch television. Meanwhile, telephone can also deliever the same events from one person to another. In a word, it is rather superficial to simply say that telephone has greater influence on people's lives than television has.
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has greater influence on people s lives than television has 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has. 78
- You are helping to select a leader for a student organization or a group. Do you think a person’s honesty is the most important characteristic for being a leader? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for government to spend money on building modern housing than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...les lives than television has. However, its a little bit haste to say that telephon...
^^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ves than television has. However, its a little bit haste to say that telephone is more inf...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'provides'.
Suggestion: provides
...tter how far the distance is. Telephone provide a novel avenue to link family members, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, in general, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2125984252 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92029636065 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57217847769 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.86738351254 428% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6499311062 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.526315789 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0526315789 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276778800561 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915017913361 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109481356524 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166451506951 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050278331366 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.