Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
I agree with this statement beacuse old friends always has much more close releationship than new friends. Also a old friend could be like a family member for other. However, new friends has just provide spend good time together. Moreover, a old one knows their friends than news one. I will explain why am I agree with this statement with some articles.
Firstly, someone has more attention to keep their old friends rather than make new friends beacuse old friends has relationship with someone. For example, I remember to one of my friend who went same school with me. We had been friend since 1997 and it is makes own relationship really closely. In this circumstance, even I could not explain my feeling to him, he always can understand my motion. And ın my opnion, it is very significant think for friends. I never forget I felt embarrsied when I had first met with my girlfriend, but he had understood my feel immediately and he tried to become relax me. However, if I had gone with my a new friends, I would stayed embarrised and I never became boyfriend's my grilfriend.
Secondly, old friends could be like family member for someone. And besides it is made greatly trusted person but in the contrast new friends never can be trusted person or like a family member. For instance, my father had a old friend who was shared same first school with him. They had found a store which is related with clothes. He is strongly trusted his friend and they are really made huge amount of money, but if he did not keep his old friend, he will never became succesful. Beacuse he can not trust a new friends. Eventually he was not be able to opened this store. And it is other reason why keep old friends really important than make new friends.
In the colcusion, I agree with this statement beacuse most probably old friend a very trusted person, they can be like a family member and also they are be able to understand their friends feel directly. All these reasons are made absoultly valuable old friends rather than new friends.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-29 | Bashir Ahmad Faizi | 3 | view |
2019-11-27 | NIMA SAEEDI | 66 | view |
2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
2019-10-13 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
2019-09-18 | rahulsingh773 | 70 | view |
- ds 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how theyoppose specific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e close releationship than new friends. Also a old friend could be like a family mem...
^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...se releationship than new friends. Also a old friend could be like a family membe...
^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ide spend good time together. Moreover, a old one knows their friends than news o...
^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could not explain my feeling to him, he always can understand my motion. And ın ...
^^
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'friend'?
Suggestion: friend
...e. However, if I had gone with my a new friends, I would stayed embarrised and I never ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 662, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'stay'
Suggestion: stay
...had gone with my a new friends, I would stayed embarrised and I never became boyfriend...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ily member. For instance, my father had a old friend who was shared same first sc...
^
Line 3, column 516, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'friend'?
Suggestion: friend
...ccesful. Beacuse he can not trust a new friends. Eventually he was not be able to opene...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...st a new friends. Eventually he was not be able to opened this store. And it is ot...
^^
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, I agree with this statement beacuse most probably old friend a very trusted ...
^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... like a family member and also they are be able to understand their friends feel d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61325966851 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48148726907 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450276243094 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7806063128 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.9090909091 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129439346896 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501572085957 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406686774691 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1067054925 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337942721298 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.