Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Nowadays television has pervasive impact on peoples’ life and it has changed the pattern of relationships among friends and family members. I personally believe that television has resulted into decline of communication among friends and relatives. I assert the above statement for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, people now spend lot of time for watching television serial and reality shows. Consequently, they have less time to communicate with their friends and family members. The relationship depends on how frequently we communicate with each other and due to lesser number of communication, we are going too far from our close ones. My own life is a compelling example. After coming back from office, I use to watch cricket matches and different reality shows until midnight. As a result, I usually have no time to communicate with my friends and relative. Now I feel that the bondage with my family members and close ones have been unleashed to some extent.
Secondly, I feel that as people are engaging themselves in watching television, they have very time to take care of their family members. To be well concern about counter party’s difficulties and hard time is a pre requisite in every relationship; no matter what the relationship is. We should be aside our friends in his/her difficult times and this proves how much we feel your friend. If we do not support our friends and family members in their hardship then these relationship are bound to break down in some time. For instance, during my graduation one of my friend helps me a lot in doing my thesis and it’s almost 18 years have been passed since my graduation, but still I remember his supports and I always try to be beside him in his hard time.
In conclusion, I believe that taking care as well as to stay beside our friends and family members in all time are the factors, which determines the future course of any relationship. Since the invention of television, there is lack of these two things among people in maintaining any relationship and it has been resulted into destruction of relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Bashir Ahmad Faizi | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | NIMA SAEEDI | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | alta | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | rahulsingh773 | 70 | view |
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Rembrandt's painting 60
- When you face difficult problems in life what do you feel is the best way to solve them asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 90
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ample. After coming back from office, I use to watch cricket matches and different ...
^^^
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this relationship' or 'these relationships'?
Suggestion: this relationship; these relationships
...d family members in their hardship then these relationship are bound to break down in some time. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94475138122 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8839461483 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9866085517 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.294117647 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156708737943 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581965390875 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466252678792 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105460705845 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560233280178 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.