Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Searches and statistics reveal that Earth population is growing extremely year by year which visibly show the need for more resources and more apparatus. I personally believe that as human population is increasing, there will be more need for cars in twenty years. Following reasons fully demonstrates why I think this way.
First of all, increased population demand more and more jobs which this boost the need for more cars carrying stuff from home to work. All people who have careers feel extremely demanding cars to use for various purposes including getting work place from home, traveling, shopping and many other chores. As an example, my father was not obliged to buy a car when he worked near our home in a shop, but when he was hired in a company far distant from our home, he felt that he must buy a car. Now beside ridding his car from home to his work and vice versa, he uses his car for going picnic, purchasing good for home and other routine works. This example show using a car to get work place from home.
Secondly, children after twenty years get older and require cars for visiting their parents. Usually children when they become enough old they travel other cities and states for continuing their education, so this will boost the need for a car to occasionally visit their parents. Moreover, even some students who live with their parents may need cars for ridding to their schools or universities. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Although I lived with my parents in one apartment, but I felt to have a car when I entered to university because my university was far from my home and all my classmates had cars, so I needed to buy one car for my own use.
In the conclusion, I strongly believe that there will be more numbers of cars in use after twenty years than there are today. I think this way because number and distance of jobs will boost the need for cars and because children get enough old after twenty years, and they need a car to regularly visit their parents and use for getting university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- TPO 28 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People communicate witheach other less than in the past because of the popularity of television. Use specific reasonsand examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, even so, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60928961749 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40258409711 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483606557377 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.249628775 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.466666667 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184293172391 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873184711186 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724851295548 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136930906032 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541006500975 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.