Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Attending a university is one of the most crucial parts of human life. We can learn many things from the university environment and working on a project is one of the important things. By working on a group project, we can improve ourselves socially and academically. So, I prefer to communicate about a project person to person over an email for the following reasons. First of all, communicating with people of different perspectives and ideas, the teamwork will improve and at the same time, team members will have an opportunity to improve their certain lack of ability. For example, I had a problem with my computer skills, when we had to prepare a project about the marine environment. My responsibility was to take charge of information technology, even though I sucked at it. My teammate helped me to solve my problem and it made me happy. Secondly, using e-mail is an old-fashioned way. Even though nowadays is a technological area, students do not use e-mail in their daily lives. They just use social networks to communicate with each other. Besides, an email is only used in formal things like a business meeting. If the group project is formal, we will not create a close bond with teammates and it will not ensure a productive project. Thirdly, by learning to work in groups, we will learn basic needs for the work environment. In a group project, someone leads others, encourages them to participate and brainstorm ideas. For example, when we find a job after graduation, it will be a new environment. We need to have crucial skills to adapt there, like stating our ideas clearly, being responsible, respecting others, and being punctual. In conclusion, to make group project better, communication in person is really important rather than e-mail. Teamwork is an essential skill that will be necessary for the future. We can improve ourselves, make friends with different people, thus encourage ourselves to do better and better.
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 85
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 78
- The zebra mussel a freshwater shellfish native to Eastern Europe has long been spreading out from its original habitats and has now reached parts of North America There are reasons to believe that this invasion cannot be stopped and that it poses a seriou 80
- mnmn 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents job than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96625766871 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92473523229 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4019086281 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.95 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286974364359 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867218405797 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643162456661 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286974364359 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96625766871 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92473523229 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4019086281 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.95 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.53405017921 22% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286974364359 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867218405797 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643162456661 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286974364359 0.150856017488 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.