Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that there are various ways to approach a project or research,but the interaction of group members is of the highest importance. This communication can be through email or in person. Personally, I believe that meetings in person is more viable. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will express in the following essay.
To begin with, there is a forml style of email and messages when you are communicating with your colleagues. To be more specific, emails can't be longer than a specific lines and thereby only the gist of an issue can be addressed there. Moreover, due to to the limited interchangable information via emails, it is possible that the number of sending and recieving emails surpasses an ordinary number. It can lead to an awkward feeling of the person who is asking the question. My last semester experience is a compelling example of this. I had my final graduation project and it was close to its due, thus I was extremly nervous and my questions were ample. However, when I asked my supervisor professor a few of my questions and he responded with delay, I got the feeling that I might be a disturbance to him. As a result, I gave up so many of them and spent pretty too much time to find the answers myself.
Furthermore, being in the same atmosphere with teammates can increase the team performance. Each individual has a special way to deal with different matters. As long as team members work together, they can learn each other's approaches toward the same thing and it will be followd by members information surge, which they can use in the futre when they work alone. It is a substantional achievement which is infeasible in intaraction through emails. For instance, when I was a sophomore at university, my friend and I had to conduct a research together and hand in the result in a specific format. My friend didn't have that much experience with the Microsoft Word, so she used to make her content list by hand; when I figured out that how much troubles she has with the content without knowing there's an easier way, I taught her. Hadn't we worked together in the same place, I wouldn't have noticed it and she would have used the same approach she had.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it might be possible to solve little problems through email, however, in person interaction with others can bring so many more benefites for everyone, therefore it's a better way of communication.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...s ways to approach a project or research,but the interaction of group members is of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...colleagues. To be more specific, emails cant be longer than a specific lines and the...
^^^^
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...e can be addressed there. Moreover, due to to the limited interchangable information ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...he same thing and it will be followd by members information surge, which they can use i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 607, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... result in a specific format. My friend didnt have that much experience with the Micr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...st by hand; when I figured out that how much troubles she has with the content witho...
^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...he has with the content without knowing theres an easier way, I taught her. Hadnt we w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Hadn't
...ing theres an easier way, I taught her. Hadnt we worked together in the same place, I...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 875, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...we worked together in the same place, I wouldnt have noticed it and she would have used...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... more benefites for everyone, therefore its a better way of communication.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67517401392 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79813615602 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5313225058 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1433283055 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185249488312 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523662395284 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409643253255 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107463422244 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225734387771 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.