Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Communication in person is most important in each and every field to work better together. Personally I agree that classmates or colleagues should communicate in person instead of e-mails. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, we can understand the feelings and expressions of a person when they are physically available. My personal experience is a compelling of this example, my friend asked me to explain about a topic from a subject, for that we decided to meet at someplace. When I was explaining I could understand her feelings, and it was very easy for me whether she understood my way of explaining or not. Moreover, she asked me many doubts the same time and I was able to solve it and it became easy for us to communicate in person rather than e-mail where I would not know that whether she understood the topic or not after my explanation.
Secondly, in some professions being in person is very important to communicate to work faster. For instance, I work as a dental assistant in a clinic and I should be in-person to work faster and to assist my dentist, meanwhile, I cannot work through e-mails as I should attend the clinic physically. Additionally, I should take care of arranging the instruments and seating for the patients which cannot be done through e-mails. Even my dentist cannot attend patients through e-mails, so he always comes to the clinic every day in order to perform various procedures on patients. Since communicating and being in person is recommended for some professions to get their work done.
In conclusion, I'm of the opinion that when people can attend physically to communicate for work, it would be better to understand their feelings, opinion and also not every professional can do productive work through e-mails if there is compulsory to be in person like health professionals, civil engineers, astronauts and many other.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 70
- agnostids 75
- team work in a project 78
- Methods to prevent birds from getting injured 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me professions to get their work done. In conclusion, Im of the opinion that wh...
^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...get their work done. In conclusion, Im of the opinion that when people can att...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...ionals, civil engineers, astronauts and many other.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 327.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90825688073 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97214669512 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507645259939 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1003507238 48.9658058833 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219417009751 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922365252543 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613550282415 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151343833658 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663837840372 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.