Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

At workplaces or schools, communication would be a good way for being in touch and make a better relationship among themselves. In my opinion, students and colleagues should meet each other while they are working on a project. I feel this way for two main reasons which I explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, arrange a face-to-face meeting for classmates or colleagues brings unexpected ideas rather than emails. Consequently, in meetings students could know each other better and share their ideas. While they are meeting each other, they could do group working and get beneficial feedbacks due to their project. my personal experience is a compelling example of this. Last year, when I was about o graduate from my master's degree, I had to finish my project by a deadline. After a while, I was setting some days in a week to meet my classmates to share our ideas to finish our project. Besides, while we were in search of some specific articles, we could find out easily and encourage each other to do the process properly. However, communication through a project could be more useful rather than emails.
Secondly, communications through emails can facilitate some activities through a project but meeting in person among group members could be highly beneficial. In other words, somehow emails make ambiguity for other persons who received them, and you have to explain the main idea through email. That is why communicating face-to-face will be a decisive factor in arranging materials for doing a project. To be more specific while colleagues and classmates doing team works, they can boost the quality of their work. For example, in the last example when we were arranging some days to meet each other, we tried to collect the proper materials and collect them for the meeting. We were able to discuss the various parts of our project and mention some notes, while this could not happen through emails. For this reason, by meeting each other we could see the progress of the process and do it in the nick of time.
In conclusion, communication with classmates and colleagues face-to-face is highly beneficial rather than emails. This is because, through communications among group members during a project, classmates and colleagues could be more in touch and they can spend more time on the project.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-15 saharmnd 80 view
2023-03-15 saharmnd 78 view
2023-02-26 hamidbrz 83 view
2023-02-18 zaid 83 view
2023-01-26 lolo_7 60 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user NazaninLing :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...eficial feedbacks due to their project. my personal experience is a compelling exa...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01813471503 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80220000975 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.686233041 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.85 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26742565412 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934532306786 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427627761569 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186358113847 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179165123034 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.