Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that working as a member of a team on class projects has several social and educational benefits for students than when they do their assignments alone. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that when students are executed projects in an organized group they spend most of their time to entertainment and it is just wasting the valuable time of education and the manager should avoid it in schools. However, I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
First and foremost, doing a project in collaboration with other students is more amazing and interesting for students than when they work alone. Spending some happy time would be really helpful for students to increase their energy and courage to follow their assignments more serious. In addition, sometimes when the projects did not flow very well and some members of the group became hopeless and tired, always there are some ones who have the role of motivating factor to impulse others to go ahead.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that when students work in a group they can use other students knowledge on the subject. For example, during my master thesis, I was work on professor masudis' lab and the most important emphasis in his lab was the ability of team working. It was a wonderful experience for me because in our lab everybody assisted other ones unless it is their task or not. All of us, success to finished our research project very sooner than other similar groups, because we did not need to spend the time to learn some common techniques by themselves.
Finally, yet importantly, doing projects in the assign groups lead to students to learn more deeply. When students listen to their teammate point of view, they learn how looking at the problems from different dimensions could provide a more effective solution. This fact not only is helpful to learn more and do better their current assignment, but also it would be a very useful skill that will be assisted them in their future life.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that it is better teachers assign projects in the way which students work in the group than when they work alone on the projects. Because it motivated them and increased their attempt, and also they could use from other students ideas and save a lot of time.
- TPO44-Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are relate 73
- TPO 33 68
- TPO 47 80
- TPO 3: Agree or disagree: It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ents work in a group they can use other students knowledge on the subject. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, really, so, still, well, for example, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83105022831 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48403505232 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7184061292 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.066666667 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461920314546 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18065772281 0.076458572812 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171050430658 0.0737576698707 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285213001174 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122190268153 0.0645574589148 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.