Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Working together as a group pays an important role on opening students mind. Some people may say that students would perform better if they work alone. Others, however, argue this notion. In my opinion, young learners would benefit from being part of a team.

First of all, students who work on their project with other students would be able to bring out the best of themselves. This is because the team members will encourage each other, so that they could have the best result for their common work. For instance, a recent research has shown that the spirit of the group has inspired each of the team member to highly contribute to their project. The positive outcomes of this inspiration were greatly appreciated by each of them. According to this evidence, it would be better for students to participate in group projects and realize their potential.

Furthermore, young adults that involve themselves in a group work will have an opportunity to learn from each other. The background of each team member might be different; therefore, they would like to share information and ideas with each other. By doing this, students could learn interesting new things, which will broaden their knowledge to a degree that is favorable for them. For instance, three decades ago, when I was in university, a majority of my assignment were in a group work. At that time I enjoyed working with others, and I realized that I was a good team player, and my work was effective. Working on with a group of other students helped me to became a good listener and learn from others new concepts, notions, and ideas, which I used to shape my opinions and be more creative in our group work. If I had never worked on group projects, I might had not learnt those fascinating things that I know today. That is why, students will perform better if they work as a group.

In conclusion, Young learners should work together as a group. This is because they will benefit by encouraging each other, and that will led them to a good quality of work. And because students will learn from each other, which is going to help them become more

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-21 Zmx_109 88 view
2023-05-05 Umme Abiha 70 view
2023-01-20 nikki07hung 70 view
2022-12-24 nikki07hung 70 view
2022-12-24 nikki07hung 66 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...lt for their common work. For instance, a recent research has shown that the spirit of the group ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to interest'.
Suggestion: to interest
...er. By doing this, students could learn interesting new things, which will broaden their kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73243243243 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47784780197 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472972972973 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4602180465 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.55 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244601063209 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883769139182 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057148728949 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161490859351 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364709763904 0.0645574589148 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.