Teachers use many techniques that help to enhance their students abilities. I do agree with assigning projects on which students must work together. We should take many factors into consideration when discussing such issue. I will explain my stance in detail below.
To begin with, when the students work in as groups or in teams, that would reflect positively on them in many aspects. One essential benefit that the team work will booster their ability to work in teams in the future. All jobs in the contemporary era require team work skills. This skill needs time to be build and developed. Therefore, if the students trained this skill or ability in their learning process, that would certain lead to better qualities in their personalities. Moreover, they will learn to pay attention and listen to other opinions around them, which is something vital for developing their understanding of the world around them. People who are willing and able to listen to all different point of views are definitely will be better leaders. The society in which all members take into account all the other stances, not only theirs, is likely to be a happy successful society than those of one opinion. The person who grow up in such environment will tend to have wider prospective for the his community and for the whole world around him. I have recently read about a research conducted in some American university that indicated that those children who are raised in more collaborative democratic families where every one can express and share his or her opinions with others have the most important traits for a dynamic society that has bigger chances in prosperity and development.
Secondly, when students work in groups and get feedback from their own peers, they will be instilled in their mentality directly, in contrast to taking directions or instructions from their teachers. Students, especially at certain ages, tend to be reluctant to any direct advice or error correction, however, when that happens during working with their mates, it will be easier to accept it and to be engraved in their minds. The teacher's role in that case is much like the supervisor or the guidance who do not give directions rather than organize the required work or task. All the researched that have been conducted on young people indicates that they learn much faster during working with their peers. I remember when I was a child, I probably listen or convinced more with my friends' opinions or views.
in conclusion, I do believe that when students work in groups in their class activities, it will reflect positively on their education and their characters.
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 70
- TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand th 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to s 80
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1008, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...will tend to have wider prospective for the his community and for the whole world aroun...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 432, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... and to be engraved in their minds. The teachers role in that case is much like the supe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ith my friends opinions or views. in conclusion, I do believe that when stud...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00904977376 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6456120113 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527149321267 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2170499227 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260590451534 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941003206881 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105884323647 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194959234276 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735643112584 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.