Nowadays communities play a significant role in cities. They provide several services like pursuing city problems or establishing Non-Governmental Organizations(NGOs) for the sake of public benefit. Also, people from all walks of life take part in these communities, but most of their members are young individuals. As a result, I disagree that young people do not contribute to their local or national communities.
First, most of the young people seek challenges and are enthusiastic to be a member of a community. Since many young individuals are knowledgeable, they know spending time in communities have several advantages for society and the future of themselves. These young adults know the work they do and the time they spend will make their hometown or nation a better place to live. As an example, consider Association For Animal Protection(AFAP) in our city which provides shelter and food for abandoned animals. This organization has managed by a young animal activist couple. Their organization attracted numerous young girls and boys who play important roles like defending community interest in governmental entities. Not to mention that elderly persons are also contributing time to this community to make its atmosphere friendly.
A community cannot function without the help of youth who contribute their time and energy because there are several tasks in a community that needs physical strength and patient. However, they are humble enough to remain unknown. For instance, those communities that work for reserving natural resources need man and woman to monitor companies and farmers. This kind of inspection cannot happen without the help of young members, but these young members do their work without advertising their responsibilities, so nobody may notice their contribution. As a result, we can conclude that there are young people whose contribution remains unknown.
As stated in previous lines, there is a lot of young persons who immerse themselves in local and national communities but no one has noticed their contribution. On the other hand, there are so many interested young adults that are founders of different communities.
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 60
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 65
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tient. However, they are so humble that dont want to be known. For instance, those c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...onclude that there are young people who dont want to be named or introduced. As s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34366197183 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09652940344 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532394366197 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5319072444 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.388888889 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192415243317 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669198768861 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688888380961 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130834324523 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431796752321 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.