Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that university managers should have an attempt to eliminate unnecessary courses from students schedules. Contrary, to this popular belief there are still those who argue that history is very important part of each nation's culture and it is really essential for all of the university students to take this kind of courses during their education in the university. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
First and foremost, putting up history courses in students schedules as requirements courses, cause to tighten students time for learning more skills and abilities that are very important for their major field of study. For example, what are benefits of taking courses about the history of the Neolithic period for IT students, when they could take some specific courses instead of these history courses. Most students have limited time for study in the university and pass courses to graduate. In addition, they should pay remarkable tuition to the university, thus they mainly try to pass requirements courses to graduate as soon as possible. Therefore, in this condition, most students ignore a lot of helpful optional courses that can have very positive effects on their knowledge to find a good job in future.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that offering history courses without specialisation cannot attract students attention and is not helpful for them. Taking history courses could be useful just if they cover subjects that related to each field of study, for example, chemistry students take history class about the history of the discovery of minerals and their characteristics, not take the class about the history of nomadic lifestyle that is really boring for most of the students.
On the basis of reasons that was mentioned above, I am convinced that taking history courses should not be required, to students who are not history majors. Because it wastes the valuable time of education and would not be helpful for students in their future jobs. Furthermore, the history courses are beneficial just if these courses specialize in each field of study.
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phone video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children s development 62
- TPO 33 68
- People try new dangerous sports such as sky-diving or rock climbing. Should such sports be banned? 70
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 92
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... culture and it is really essential for all of the university students to take this kind o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 805, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s on their knowledge to find a good job in future. Another significant fact that shou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, kind of, of course, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22343324251 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6695377882 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482288828338 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.1135272676 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.461538462 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362096971007 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155127433359 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114412094917 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252635522424 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716114320592 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.