It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more complex. Indeed, thanks to monumental scientific and technological achievements we have reached a relative comfort and sustainability. Some people are in believing that our convenience is owed to the effort of those who were creative and were able to find a simple solution for wrapped problems. Whereas, others contradict this point of view by attributing being disciplined as a major reason for overcoming faced difficulties. The following essay takes an elaborating look at whether being creative is a decisive factor or planning carefully to ultimately attain a logical conclusion.
There is no denying that being organized always leads to solving our problems to some extent. In fact, without having a program you may miss some part of your tasks even in daily life, like a meeting, buying, calling, doing homework or holding keys. Although the given examples are so trivial and may not ensue destructive results, generalizing these irregularities in a large sample would emerge unpleasant consequences. For instance, suppose an international corporation falling in the real problem, lack of a definite program for critical occasions would direct it toward bankrupt. As another sample, when a ship captivates by the ocean's fury, the crew must stay calm and act according to pre-prepared plans for an urgent time. Controlling of, airports, railway, harbors, industries, economy, stock market and business without a general plan is actually impossible.
Admittedly, another powerful tool which helps us come out from unfortunate situations is having a creative mind. Scientists found that being creative is an intrinsic matter and these peoples mostly tend to be chaotic. It is because of their mined are too busy running different cases simultaneously. The most celebrated people like Leonardo Davinci, Albert Ainestain, Mozart are clear crystal instances of creative persons. The outlook of these types of individuals toward solving problems is different than the ordinary people and is able to play game-changing rules in sensitive moments. In this regard, a group of sociologists and psychologists conducted an investigation to found being more creative is efficient in solving problems or having a program. They found that when the interference factors in the problem are few the being creative is a decisive factor. Conversely, as the problem goes to be more complicated with lots of involved factors a winner is a person with a consolidated plan for each step.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that depends on condition one may be preferred to the other. Totally, having scheduled program is an essential rule and works almost every where and time, but being creative sprout in certain conditions
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 76
- A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time. 90
- Are environmental issues too complex to be handled by the individual? 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process. 76
- Some people like to work at home, while others prefer to work in the office. Which do you prefer and why 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...timately attain a logical conclusion. There is no denying that being organized...
^^
Line 2, column 637, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'oceans'' or 'ocean's'?
Suggestion: oceans'; ocean's
...r sample, when a ship captivates by the oceans fury, the crew must stay calm and act a...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 504, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ls toward solving problems is different than the ordinary people and is able to play...
^^^^
Line 6, column 228, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...m is an essential rule and works almost every where and time, but being creative sprout in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, if, look, may, so, whereas, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2451.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36323851204 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04528369894 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619256017505 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 769.5 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9740908827 48.9658058833 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7619047619 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230651480397 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590539070944 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479964793678 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119752723921 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713149706036 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.