Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families. Help from the government is unnecessary.
Since the dawn of humanity, government, as an inseparable part of each glorious civilization, can be mentioned as the most important position for all the societies. While nowadays some people subscribe to the view that government is the most significant pillar of solving real-life challenges, others hold the opposite idea. Be that as it may, many remain neutral and adamantly claim that a myriad of elements should be taken into the consideration so as to be able to prove which belief is closer to reality. To my way of thinking, the more people settle down their problems themselves, the more they get a better understanding of their lives and become a more well-rounded person in dealing with other future issues. So I can say that this statement is the one I can be in agreement with. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my conspicuous viewpoints.
This argument is supported with the persuasively-stated evidence not just opinion that relying on ourselves rather than government is the best policy dealing with the life problems. In fact, no one has a more comprehensive knowledge of some one's real situations than the individual himself. Furthermore, life is a world of challenges, even some of them are not predictable, and resolving the problems without helping of the government makes us a self-sufficient person in the life, since require our complete engagements in various situations as much as possible, owing to the fact that referring to the governmental agencies for the profusion of problems we will encounter in life is not sensible. As a case of point, I vividly remember, two years ago, when despite my fully contribution in variegated of projects, I had a serious problem with my manager at work about my unfair salary. I took an appointment from his secretary, and then represented some convincing evidence to support my sincerely involvement. This negotiation was a promising start into my legitimate rights. To put it differently, this experience helps me to gain a better perception in order to handle my similar future problems. Therefore, my personal experience completely corroborate the fact that striving to deal with the tough difficulties without helping of the government is the best option.
By the same token, one should regard another subtle point meticulously that in addition to achieving the better results, people can enhance their self-confidence by handling their issues themselves, which foster the development of the sense of self-satisfaction in their lives is its crowning achievement. The sentiment expressed in this sentence embodies the view that, resolving the real-life problems not only improve your analyzing power in intricate life situations, but also provide you to be an outstanding independent individual in life. For instance, I read a scientific magazine about human personalities, according to the research, the rate of successful individuals in people who deal with their problems themselves is significantly higher than those who ask for help from the governmental agencies. Hence, this worthwhile statistics throw some light on the point that relying on our own abilities in order to deal with the problems give us more chance to strengthen our self-esteem and happiness in the life.
By and large, according to the above-mentioned reasons, I vehemently agree with this standpoint that solving our problems without helping of the government is the best way to confront the challenges in the life. Now the inevitable question is whether we need to change habits in our daily routine.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-22 | jimHsu | 60 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | wxr031 | 80 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | serena_wus | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | serena_wus | 93 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | Qq99 | 60 | view |
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 81
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 81
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 80
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 81
- TPO-02 - Integrated Writing Task In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 450, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... should be taken into the consideration so as to be able to prove which belief is closer...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, as to, even so, for instance, in addition, in fact, by and large, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2997.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 570.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25789473684 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2093895984 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.0659226157 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.85 100.406767564 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293623658721 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790401049566 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643487975787 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176533788595 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364559883964 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 86.8835125448 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.