Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past
Before tendering my opinion I guess it is crucial to take a quick glance at this argument on both sides. Although some people may hold the view that technology let children be less creative than in the previous years, Others believe that these days children are much smarter than before. From my own perspective, I concur with the first group who believe that technology let most of the children being uncreative. I have numerous reasons why I subscribed to a distinct attitude elaborating cogently in the subsequent paragraphs.
First reason coming to my mind consolidating my standpoint is that the children should know the technological detriment on their lives. Furthermore, many studies claimed that technology in this century let the children, in general, being distracted, additionally, the researcher and sciences improved the negative effect of technology by affecting the intelligence level of people especially children. One of the most important concepts poses the previous studies is smartphones, internet, social media and robots which they let the children being laziness and non-improvable. For instance, they could search for any kind of topics on the websites instead of reading books, novels or even attend classes or lectures.
Another reason which deserves some words, technology influences the children in really unhealthy ways by letting the percentage of loneliness increased within time and that will impact the children wellness. This will eventually enable them to develop social and conversational skills. In contrast to other children which they have limited access to technology because of their financial reasons, they are more socialized and they can share the knowledge, information, ideas with each other. I should mention that every notion and concept that every single child learns in life will gradually build his or her fundamental knowledge in the future.
Apart from the points I made above there is also another reason that I want to mention, nowadays the internet provides overwhelming information to kids and they may end up confused. Besides they couldn’t always recognize the right for the wrong information. Also, they don’t have enough knowledge to decide the right options for them, and this would increase the change to use inappropriate websites for their ages. However, the present generation has abundant sources of websites available and their parents are often unaware of what the child is up to. It is always children the easy prey and unknowingly they fall into bad hands.
To put it briefly, I strongly agree that technology makes our life much comfortable and easier than in the past. But the parents should monitor their children about what they are using technology and that’s can help them to improve critical thinking, and also breeds them better future in order that achieves acceptance in colleges. In a nutshell, in fact, there are the multiplicity of other factors supplementing the aforementioned statements, which could be alluded here, but are not embraced due to the dearth of time
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-31 | harman442 | 90 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | MiladHakimi | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 76
- which one do you prefer telephone or television and why 90
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what type of neighbor is the best to have? -Someone who is quiet -someone who we are similar to -someone who is supportive Use specific details and examples in your answer 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...n to kids and they may end up confused. Besides they couldn't always recognize the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, well, apart from, for instance, i guess, in contrast, in fact, in general, kind of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34020618557 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86994163546 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 277.0 212.727598566 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571134020619 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2874487323 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229771170779 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630209956357 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589964851957 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125246685123 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270644179408 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 86.8835125448 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.