Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Universities should make a high level of quality for both the students and the professors. Because it is a place which is impact directly to success of a society. Although some people believe that the professor salary is not important, I think it gas highly effect on their work in a university which is important for improvement of a university because of the reasons which will be discuss in detail below.
The first and the important reasons is that, by high salaries the professors become more encourage to do their best in a university. To be more specific, when someone get more money to do something he try to do his best because he wants to restitution the money which gives. For example, I worked for a company two years ago, they give me 1000 dollar every mount which is too less for me. In this way I was not satisfy by that job and I didn't do my best for that company just because of my salary.
The second reason is that, when the professors has high salaries, they have free mind to do their job with higher concentration. In other word, when they have not financial problem, they can focus just in the teaching. Furthermore, I see a lot of professors who have another job because they believe that they cannot earn enough money by just being a professor.
In conclusion, I completely believe that to improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. By doing so they can not only encourage the professor to do their best on university, but also the professors have more free mind to focus on their job and they are not forced to find another job for financial problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gases', 'gasses'?
Suggestion: gases; gasses
...sor salary is not important, I think it gas highly effect on their work in a univer...
^^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...es the professors become more encourage to do their best in a university. To be more ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gets'.
Suggestion: gets
...sity. To be more specific, when someone get more money to do something he try to do...
^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tries'.
Suggestion: tries
...meone get more money to do something he try to do his best because he wants to rest...
^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...ompany two years ago, they give me 1000 dollar every mount which is too less for me. I...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'satisfied'.
Suggestion: satisfied
... too less for me. In this way I was not satisfy by that job and I didnt do my best for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...way I was not satisfy by that job and I didnt do my best for that company just becaus...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1977.66487455 69% => OK
No of words: 294.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61224489796 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67348669742 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 212.727598566 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479591836735 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0286197598 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25153927594 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114591247335 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128657924938 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173716212192 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901833663896 0.0645574589148 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.