Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
In this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, every aspect of our life is influenced by technologies. In my opinion, technologies, such as email have helped classmates and coleagues to produce better work for their projects. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First of all, communication via email is much more convinient, since students can exchange their ideas in any time they can. Usualy, universities and offices are open until 5 PM, so people have a limited time to communicate with their mates about the project in person. However, contacting online, would be a great opportunity to expand their working hours and make it more flexible. For instance, my brother is working part time, besides his studies in the university. He usually communicate with his coleagues by email and does his work's projects online, after he comes back from the university. In that way he is able to adjust his time efficiently for both the university and the work. Had he not done his work's project via email, he would not have been able to fullfil his university's duties.
Moreover, in order to communicate in person, we need to be in the same place with others, while sometimes it is not possible to stay in a certain location for a long time. Developing project online would give the opportunitie to individuals to be in different cities or even various countries since email does not have any geographical boundaries. My own experience demonstrates this situation. Two years ago when I was junior at the university, we had to do a groupe project for Comuter Networks course at the end of the semester. However, due to the closing of dormitories, I was obliged to go back to my city. I suggested my friend that we could progress our project, online and exchange our ideas via email. She accepted and at the end we were able to complete our project perfectly and got a full mark for that course.
To conclude, I firmly believe that advent of online technologies like email, have helped students and co-workers to be more productive in their projects. This is due to the fact that not only they have flexible time to work on their project but also they are not bounded to geographical locations.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 70
- TPO48 11
- TPO50 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...produce better work for their projects. In what follows, I will delve into the mos...
^^
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...le. For instance, my brother is working part time, besides his studies in the university....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'communicates'.
Suggestion: communicates
...s studies in the university. He usually communicate with his coleagues by email and does hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85529715762 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85110710135 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545219638243 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5645581252 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8947368421 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3684210526 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226318891087 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680855858122 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520039461748 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125959014736 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314803426063 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.