Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Communication plays a pivotal role in work and a better communication skill can increase the productivity of the work. However, a plethora of people contents that communication by e-mail is enough for project work but others disagree with the statement. Not surprisingly, the number of controversies over this issue is overwhelmed. Among this controversy, I personally believe communication in person is better for productive work. I feel this way for several reasons I will expound subsequent followings.
To commence with, person to person communication provides people a clear idea and concept of the project work which is not possible by e-mail. Moreover, if they feel any difficulties they can discuss and provide a reasonable solution for the problem. Besides, it also time-consuming and work can be done efficiently. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in college, I developed a project with the help of some of my friends. When first I got the idea I shared it with my friends in e-mails, they were interested in the idea but on one was not sure about the idea. Moreover, I could not able to express the whole idea by email, thus we decided to meet in person. On the day, I required only half an hour I explained the idea and they easily understood the notion.
Furthermore, e-mail has some limitation like all the files and document cannot share with the another. Besides, some e-mail automatically goes to the spam box which is really unconvincing. For example, I am an electrical engineer and need to work on various complex programs such as Matlab, VLSI, Java and sometimes some of the files could not able to upload. Recently, in my workplace, I needed to share some of the files with my colleagues because I was out of the city and they need it because of some emergency. But, they did not get the file because the file was so large and they download the file but could not able to recollect the main data. Thus, email is sometimes unconvincing.
To recapitulate, I am on the opinion that person to person communication is better when people work on a project because people can easily communicate and explain the whole idea in a short time which is not possible in the e-mail.
- It is often necessary, even desirable , for the political leaders to withhold information from the public. 50
- tpo 46In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stor 85
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when schoolbuildings are in need of repair. 50
- Tpo41Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing 85
- Tpo11A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature—novels, plays, and poems—than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for culture in general, and 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 317, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uch as Matlab, VLSI, Java and sometimes some of the files could not able to upload. Recentl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le to upload. Recently, in my workplace, I needed to share some of the files with...
^^
Line 9, column 407, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ly, in my workplace, I needed to share some of the files with my colleagues because I was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, for example, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.828125 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95258758337 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479166666667 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4516685525 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294582756048 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090304281596 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763222734498 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192484394434 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754517566997 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.