Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the industrial revolution, the focus of production shifted to production quantity and efficiency of the workers, which gave rise to the concept of work specialization. The statement here posits that workers with different types of work is more satisfied than the worker with similar task all day long. I disagree with this statement and in the following paragraphs, I am going to explain my reasonings.
To begin with, the workers who do the similar job all day long become an specialist in that job. In current age of competition, this type of specialization can help a person to be of higher value. In current time, the performance of the worker is measured by the amount of work that is done by the worker. Being a specialist in a certain job can help a worker in this regard. Because getting specialized helps a worker to complete the task in less time. This in turn increases the efficiency of the worker and the improves the productivity of the company. And, it is a common trend in the companies today to reward the workers for their performance. So, this way a skilled worker can get rewarded for their efficiency. For instance, one of my friend, who works in a garments factory, told me that their company provides performance bonus, a monetary incentive for the worker who performs well beyond a set limit. In modern garments, generally one task is done by an individual. So, specialization can help a worker to earn extra money in that garments factory. On the other hand, having to do many different types of work and not getting much work done in the process might hurt the chance of a worker to get the performance bonus. So, this extra money can satisfy the workers.
Moreover, doing the similar task can save a worker from the burden of learning new skills. It is known that, there is a learning curve associated with learning new skills and each individual has their own forte and aptitude for particular type of tasks. During this learning period, the performance of the worker may decline. In addition, It is possible that a different type of task might not suit the worker. This can hurt the confidence of the worker resulting in reduction of performance which can reflect badly to the upper management. So, many workers don't want to come out of their comfort zone of their specialized area and learn new thing. My cousin is a compelling example of this scenario. He is a welder and very good at that. When his employer closed the company he was working for, instead of learning new skills he moved out of the state to find a job.
In conclusion, doing different types of work mau help workers of to get rid off monotony but the demand of the current era is different. With the advantage of being a specialist in a certain task and not having to learn new skills, workers tends to be satisfied more about doing the similar tasks all day long. Thus, I strongly stand by my opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 70
- R. Robustus 60
- "The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions- Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004, development along the coastal wetlands has b 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... do the similar job all day long become an specialist in that job. In current age ...
^^
Line 5, column 767, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'garments'' or 'garment's'?
Suggestion: garments'; garment's
...tance, one of my friend, who works in a garments factory, told me that their company pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1044, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'garments'' or 'garment's'?
Suggestion: garments'; garment's
...lp a worker to earn extra money in that garments factory. On the other hand, having to d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1094, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...actory. On the other hand, having to do many different types of work and not getting much work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 559, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the upper management. So, many workers dont want to come out of their comfort zone ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2406.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67184466019 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6858489389 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44854368932 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5063470651 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9285714286 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3928571429 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264912935463 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076867922015 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888636003678 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204424771475 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673877439232 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.