Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes.
There is no doubt that people tend to take a break from their hectic life and unwind by devoting some time to their personal activities. Actually, there are unlimited ways to entertain themselves such as watching favorite movies or reading books with different subjects. Although some people adhere to this belief that people’s interests, tastes and character can be distinguished through what they read or watch, in my vantage point they may read books or watch movies which are distinctive with their opinion since they can enrich their knowledge, and fortify their analytical skills.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to read books or watch movies which are against their opinion is expanding their knowledge. In fact, one of the rigors of modern hectic life is that people need to have wide variety knowledge to have promising future. Consequently, they try to broad their horizon and experience new things through reading books and watching movies in varied fields albeit they oppose with their favorites. Not only can they make rational decisions in catastrophic situations, they feel satisfied with themselves because of their proper information. In my own experience, last year I ran into a huge problem and felt despondent; so I started read a book in psychology field, although I did not willing to read it. Fortunately, understanding the concepts of this book leaves drastic effects on my personality and instills precious ideas so that revolutionizes my life. I have learnt I can benefit from reading books or watching movies even if I do not interest in them; hence, people’s favorite movies do not reflect their personality.
A further more subtle point is that people may read books or watching movies with different genre to strengthen their analytical skills. Undoubtedly, people need to strong analytical mind in order to make rational and immediate decision in catastrophic circumstances. In this way, they try to get familiar with critical situations through reading books or watching movies even they do not like them. To illustrate more, take a case of a person who hates science fiction movies; however, he watches this kind of movie every month to stimulate his creativity; also, he tries to think about causes and effects of what he notices in these movies. It provides an opportunity with him to analyze situations and guess what will happen in the next part of the movie. Moreover, although he may first feel perplexed with strange actions of movies’ characters, he soon perceives its tangible benefits through improving his analytical thinking when he has trouble; therefore we cannot exactly understand people’s personalities from what they read or watch.
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear (obvious) that enriching knowledge as well as bolstering their analytical thinking gives people incentive to read books or watch movies oppose to their viewpoints. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that we can recognize a person’s character just by his hobbies or his entertainments since individuals have complex personalities.
- Do you agree or disagree? Competitions between friends always has a negative effect on their friends? 70
- integrated 46 63
- A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 86
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1055, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onalities from what they read or watch. On the whole, according to the above-men...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'therefore', 'well', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'no doubt', 'such as', 'as well as', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235915492958 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.161971830986 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0880281690141 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0457746478873 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.100352112676 0.0685040099705 146% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.110915492958 0.118717715034 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0299295774648 0.0351676179071 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96297182555 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0369718309859 0.0309702414327 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00176056338028 0.00188951952338 93% => OK
Determiners: 0.044014084507 0.0887237588012 50% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0176056338028 0.0209618222197 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0158450704225 0.0139019557991 114% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3171.0 2387.08602151 133% => OK
No of words: 505.0 408.028673835 124% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27920792079 5.86048508987 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390099009901 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29504950495 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211881188119 0.174417080927 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152475247525 0.112833075102 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96297182555 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520792079208 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 62.4487926365 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0555555556 20.5533526081 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9857693656 48.84282405 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.166666667 120.699889404 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0555555556 20.5533526081 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.644075263715 181% => Less Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 57.5605060506 45.7405998639 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.22285714286 1.45489161554 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253453914956 0.300154397459 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111926251839 0.103427244359 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.082985694227 0.0752933317313 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480595867093 0.497263757937 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119957260969 0.151897553556 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10230329489 0.114077575197 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475774569095 0.0781384742642 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.402343344987 0.336927656856 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.100841155968 0.067059652881 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188154457285 0.210909579961 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143915487481 0.0618886996521 23% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.