Do you agree or disagree? People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families, so the help from the government is not necessary
There is no shortage of debate whether the government should interfere in solving problems of people's daily life or not. I firmly believe that people cannot solve all their problems by their own or their family and assist of government is vital. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I am going to describe as follow.
First and foremost, people cannot solve all their problems themselves. Some conflictions during daily life are big enough that a specific person cannot solve it even by recommendations of others. To assist people in these situations, there should be a third party that has a power to solve it. As an example, if we were in an economic recession in the country, some sort of products would be scarce. Therefore, finding a good like rice can be utterly difficult. Accordingly, have other people's support wouldn’t make rice available. Therefore, considerations of governments can remove the barriers to finding the product in this kind of situation. On the other hand, some problems in the daily life are against the law. People cannot solve them on their own. Constitutional interference is required to stop people to have violent reactions against each other.
Secondly, people follow their advantages and solving their problems can have significant effects on others in the community. Humankind tends to maximize his utility. As a result, this maximization wouldn’t achieve unless by minimizing the utility of the other people in the society. As a matter of fact, to inhibit this kind of activities interference of the governments are necessary since the state can inhibit these kinds of activities and suggest another solution to the involved people.
In a nutshell, I believe that government should help people to find a solution for some sorts of the problems. This is because some conflictions in the life are big enough that finding a solution for it is impossible for a particular person and people's solution can have a tremendous influence on others.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-15 | zari1991 | 70 | view |
2019-09-21 | Romina_stb | 90 | view |
2019-08-18 | mahi22 | 66 | view |
2018-09-25 | zabanenglish | 70 | view |
2018-06-27 | elham.u3 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 54
- Nowadays many movies or films are based on books Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book Which one do you prefer 90
- Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided. 70
- Do you agree or disagree? People meet many problems in their daily life and they can solve them by themselves or with the help of their families, so the help from the government is not necessary 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 319, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ain reasons that I am going to describe as follow. First and foremost, people cannot sol...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nother solution to the involved people. In a nutshell, I believe that government...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, i feel, kind of, sort of, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09422492401 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92128733254 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6824258177 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2105263158 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282565695643 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947601540545 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856988449719 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179805872153 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057980300039 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.