Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and example for to support your answer.
Some people believe that truth should only be exposed when required, to prevent unwanted pain for others. However I feel, in a relationship, being truthful is one of the important qualities a person should possess for the following reasons.
To begin with, any kind of relation persuades an individual emotionally in many ways. While a lie can turn a person into a vulnerable state, being honest makes the people stronger. For instance, I had a patient for physical therapy rehabilitation, who was an excellent basketball player. Unfortunately, he met with a fatal road accident in which one of his leg was severely injured and underwent above knee amputation to save the rest of the thigh region. The surgeon informed the family that he won’t be able to play basketball again due to the amputation. To prevent more mental trauma and pain, the parents were resilient to share this news with their son (patient) and consoled him by saying that he will recover and get back on the field to play soon. Eventually, when the son faced the reality, he was heartbroken, shocked and went into severe depression. Have his parent had not concealed the truth; their son would have been more strong, emotionally, to handle that situation.
Moreover, dishonesty can sow a seed of distrust in a relationship resulting in long-term repercussions. For example, when my cousin John was in University he had a friend named Sam. John had couple of his own original researches to conduct. On his professor’s request, he shared one of those studies with Sam. He was too excited to work on the research. On completion, against john's will, he secretely published the article by his name in an international journal instead of Johns’, who was supposed to be the first author. This episode broke off my cousin’s belief on his friend and could never trust anyone again.
In conclusion, honesty should be seriously considered in any relationship. This is because it can make the person emotionally stronger and because it brings faith which is crucial in nurturing a relationship.
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down the geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate.What are the advantages of international communication onli 78
- Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 73
- What discovery in the last 100 years has been most beneficial for people in your country? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d, to prevent unwanted pain for others. However I feel, in a relationship, being truthf...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03779069767 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99754130137 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4377757405 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2105263158 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881516211148 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300840074138 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329148563629 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656273387283 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315764671575 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.