Although some people believe that what people dress can be a good sign of their personality, I firmly concur with the idea that the way people dresses cannot demonstrate his or her personality. In what follows, I will aptly substantiate my viewpoint.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that in some schools or organizations, individuals are required to wear similar formal clothes. In fact, all the persons on that schools or organizations have the same clothes. So, there is not any way to realize the personality of different people in those situations. In the other words, in such a situation, one may cannot know who the person is, let alone figuring out his or her personality. Although some people may argue that the personality of people can be found by observing the color of individuals dress in view of the fact that different colors have varied meaning which enable us to realize the personality of persons, but recent studies, conducted in our country shows that the kind and color of a dress somebody put on have nothing to do with his/her personality.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above one should regard another subtle point meticulously that people wear different clothes in different occasions. In other word, when someone wants to go to the work, he/she should wear formal clothe such as suit. However, when that person is invited to a party, he/she wears casual clothe. Actually, hardly has anyone been known that he or she puts on same cloth in different locations. Although the supporters of the opposite viewpoint are of the opinion that no matter where someone goes, he/she is willing to put certain type of cloth, I believe that it is not a substantive evidence. Noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics shows that the type of clothe that people prefer changes when they grow older.
Taking all aforementioned arguments into accounts leads us to the conclusion that there is no link between one's personality and what he or she puts on. In some situations people are required to wear similar clothes, and they wear different clothes in different locations.
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 76
- Nowadays many movies or films are based on books Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book Which one do you prefer 79
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 90
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...onclusion that there is no link between ones personality and what he or she puts on....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, so, apart from, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02253521127 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79833883901 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523943661972 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4563492022 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207479209449 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065908672348 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820872735512 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137775225052 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961377311964 0.0645574589148 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.