n the last few decades, with the development of technology and science, it has become easier to get information around the globe from various news media. On that ground, people rely on news information in different ways according to their choices and preferences. In this regard, while some people think that they should survey a wide range of news materials in order to have deep knowledge about any incident, others take it as an exaggeration and hold the opposite viewpoint. From my vantage point, the latter view contains more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that we live in a well-advanced age, whereby people hardly get time for their personal lives. In such a scenario, depending on too much news information would pressurize people in their lives because there is a huge bulk of the information available on different news media, and spending precious time surfing through each of them would take a lot of time. In fact, it is judicious to stick with one or two news media and invest the extra time on important purposes. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I have a habit to read everyday news information before going to my workplace, however, E-newspaper on the internet saves a lot of my everyday time since I can blindly trust that newspaper rather than finding the truth on various sites or newspapers. By and large, sticking with fairly one or two resources would save me indispensable time.
Moreover, it may be quite expensive to look for news through many resources such as newspapers, magazines, and paper articles. Additionally, people need to pay for an online subscription to get news online. Eventually, people end up spending too much money on different news materials just to get the same information. For instance, a recent survey from the University of Chicago suggests that people tentatively spend more than $100 in one month on various news facilities in the united states whereas, people can get it at negligible cost on the internet. Beyond and large, it is not a wise idea to spend too much on many resources just to get a single piece of information.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that people should strict themselves to single news media in order to get a piece of news information. This is because it saves their crucial time as well as their wealth.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Competition among friends usually has a negative effect on friendship Use details and examples to support your opinion 83
- TPO 44 Integrated Writing Task 70
- Imagine that you are going to visit a new city which one of the following ways do you think is the best way to know the city in a short time 1 visit historic sites 2 go to shops and markets 3 enjoy the restaurant and spend time in cafe 73
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used e g donate money on food or service or leave the decision to the organizations 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n the last few decades, with the developm...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2009.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86440677966 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78361497558 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523002421308 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6155093078 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.611111111 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9444444444 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198903906594 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651976828478 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317904479225 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120724636724 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286232886744 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.