Nowadays, the importance of education has grown very much. Therefore, the government is also spending a lot of money on students’ education. However, some people think the government spends too much money on the universities rather than childrens’ education.I think this is a matter of course. I will tell you parts: efficient and economical to support my opinion.
First, investing in universities is more efficient. Regardless of whether children's education is good or bad, some students will study hard or some students will not study and play. For example, if children are all smart with a good education, students in prestigious schools should be smart and students in rural schools should not be able to study, but they are not. This shows that education does not directly affect students. Like this, whether the government invests more or less in school education, it is not related to the smart and intelligent students. On the other hand, the universities are a meeting that is a study group, so they will have a great effect.
Second, this is not only efficient but also conducive to economic growth. We go to the company as soon as we go to college. Therefore, if people get a high quality education in university, there will be a lot of great talent in the company and the economy will develop too. Of course, the growth of children's education will also help economic development, but investing in universities can have a very rapid effect. This is why I think it is natural for the government to focus on university education.
This is all about why the government should focus more on university education. Of course, all education is important, but if the government has to invest in a limited amount of money, investing in universities has a big effect in both of these key aspects.
- TOEFL integrated writing Chevalier de Seingalt 3
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 65
- In some countries teenagers have jobs while they are still students Do you think this is a good idea Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing It is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with this idea 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...sities rather than childrens’ education.I think this is a matter of course. I wil...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, i think, of course, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90849673203 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88548582575 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477124183007 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8847184349 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3529411765 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348795282654 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104098673648 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925427951712 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228210778675 0.150856017488 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945888131709 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.