Governments should pay more on computer technology or basic needs?
Throughout the history the world has changed in a rapid pace, thus complexity of today’s world represents new challenges and put new demands on the societies. Nowadays, we live in an era of time that recent progress in computer industry create a revolution in the world so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that governments should pay more money to improve the computer technologies. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that numerous people get stuck in their basic but essential needs; so responding to these fundamental requirements may be counted as a top priority for the governors. I am of the opinion that each of the mentioned views has their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, the continuous development of advanced computer technology opens up multitude opportunities for the human. Humankind has achieved to the different breakthrough in diverse sciences, thanks to easy availability of wide range of information, and computer knowledge plays a critical role in this regard. For instance, scientists have admirable accomplishment in order to eradicate the fatal diseases; as a result longevity in many countries increases significantly. Besides, the education system has improved because both the students and the teachers have readily access to the computers that allows them to enhance the public awareness. Consequently, societies grow well-informed and knowledgeable children who will be efficient in the future. Admittedly, investing in computer field brings a lot of positive consequences for such these modern communities.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is that food, shelter, clean water and education are the radical rights for each individual, and a growing segment of people is still dealing with the fierce competition to acquire these absolute necessities. Thus, no one can overlook the miserable circumstance that some undeveloped countries encounter. For example, when citizens in South Africa must go miles away from their residence to get the water or a large crowd of young children has been deprived of attending in the standard classes; they cannot think about high-tech devices that may assist them to improve their life. They are hungry and, witness of dying their siblings who suffer from various diseases due to lack of hygiene. In this situation, all the life is summarized in being alive and the luxury words – such as computer technology – has lost their meaning.
On the basis of the points mentioned above I am convinced that this topic is a very controversial debate since it entirely depends on the place and the condition that people live. Subsequently, most of the obvious primary requisition of a person in specific region of the world may seem the most unreachable matter for someone else in another corner.
- Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use 73
- TPO14 90
- Do you agree or disagree? Rather than help children with their schoolwork, parents should encourage their children do their work independently 70
- It is too expensive to look after and repair old buildings That money should be spent on building modern buildings instead 88
- A/D? Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 70
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25641025641 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.138067061144 0.158761421928 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112426035503 0.0866891130778 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0374753451677 0.046263068375 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0276134122288 0.0685040099705 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132149901381 0.118717715034 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0374753451677 0.0351676179071 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01100829428 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0236686390533 0.0309702414327 76% => OK
Particles: 0.00197238658777 0.00188951952338 104% => OK
Determiners: 0.122287968442 0.0887237588012 138% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0197238658777 0.0209618222197 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0157790927022 0.0139019557991 114% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2920.0 2387.08602151 122% => OK
No of words: 463.0 408.028673835 113% => OK
Chars per words: 6.30669546436 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388768898488 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.319654427646 0.251872472559 127% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250539956803 0.174417080927 144% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.172786177106 0.112833075102 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01100829428 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609071274298 0.524397521467 116% => OK
Word variations: 79.0077035129 59.2087087015 133% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 27.2352941176 20.5533526081 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7402441456 48.84282405 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.764705882 120.699889404 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2352941176 20.5533526081 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.644075263715 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 59.2007368822 45.7405998639 129% => OK
Elegance: 2.09708737864 1.45489161554 144% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.084703179846 0.300154397459 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0805326075124 0.103427244359 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0403243060949 0.0752933317313 54% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528382576754 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133659751057 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330721789583 0.114077575197 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361990035212 0.0781384742642 46% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.45086990587 0.336927656856 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0624523216115 0.067059652881 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571075520287 0.210909579961 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343794636897 0.0618886996521 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.