If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire : an experienced worker at a higher salary or inexperienced worker at a lower salary?
Some employers prefer to take experienced employees and give higher salary for them; however others opine that it is better to hire inexperienced workers and give less money for their work. In my opinion, attracting professionals to the company will give more benefits to the employer for a bulk amount of reasons.
Although experienced employee requires to be paid higher, he may bring novelistic ideas and more effective solutions to the company. Thus, having worked for another firm, the worker faced numerous professional tasks and had solutions for it. For instance, a new experienced worker, who worked as a lawyer for Baker&Makenzie Company, now may tell about tactics of effective negotiations with clients in which former company is very successive. So, it will positively impact on business affairs of the firm.
Moreover, due to the fact that experienced worker does not need any time for additional courses or an advisor, the company will economize its time and resources. Furthermore, even if the employee will be paid more, it will be offset by his self-working. However, when the employer hires an inexperienced worker, he may waste time and money for educating and tutoring the amateur.
Finally, the company may lose money if it employs inexperienced worker. For the reason beginners usually make numerous mistakes when they start to work in a new place, it may cause substantial damage to the firm. For example, when my friend was hired by a solid law firm, he lost his first process in a court because he had little experience so he could not effectively prepare his defense. This caused dissatisfaction of the clients and they rejected the further business with the law firm.
In conclusion, when the company hires experienced workers with higher salary it brings a lot of benefits to the company in case of effective work, saving money for tutoring the workers and prevention of probable loss.
- The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper:“Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for more than 70 years.Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, 50
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- The following appeared in the editorial section of a West Cambria newspaper:“A recent review of the West Cambria volunteer ambulance service revealed a longeraverage response time to accidents than was reported by a commercial ambulance squadlocated in 66
- The following is part of a business plan created by the management of the Megamartgrocery store:“Our total sales have increased this year by 20 percent since we added a pharmacy sectionto our grocery store. Clearly, the customer’s main concern is the 66
- In some organizations, promotions are based on seniority, while in other organization, promotions are based on performance. Discuss the advantages of each position. Then indicate which position you think is best and why? 60
Comments
Hi there, I discovered your…
Hi there, I discovered your blog per Google bit searching for such kinda educational advise moreover your inform beholds very remarkable for me.forklift driver hire sydney
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... brings a lot of benefits to the company in case of effective work, saving money ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10476190476 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8638967792 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552380952381 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 4.0 0.994623655914 402% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3183306597 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.45110844103 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193579310561 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759158806621 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773665505026 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131358100011 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556064940909 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.