Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
No one can deny there are both positive and negative aspects in different ways for revising some incorrect points says by teachers or leaders during their speech. In this regard, most people's opinions are divided as to whether it is right to point out a mistake or not. It is my firm conviction that the best approach is to wait until the class or meeting is over and then talk to the speaker. For a number of reasons and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
My primary reason is that I believe every mistake must be correct as soon as possible but in public situations interrupt and revise the mistake may cause forgetting the lecture by the lecturer during class or meeting and in some cases ruin the entire lecture. This procedure not only is a distraction factor between the audience and the speaker but also has a negative impact on the people's judgment about talk. I will have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I was a teenager I participated in the lecture about some new achievement in space discovery. You see, when the speaker was moving the topic forward, I suddenly interrupt and presented a note for correcting, The speaker accepts my point but after that, he completely loses his concentrate for carrying a topic. As a result, this way is not so great and respectful for performing.
Second, probably some points that offer to correct a mistake are not right. Statistically, according to the study on most public speeches, more than 50 percent of the audience have not necessary and valid points through the lecture and they just struggle to show himself as a professional. So as you can see it is certainly clear to see why I think most of the abjections are in the wrong way.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that the best thing to do when the teacher or leader says something incorrect is that wait until the meeting end and after that makes the note.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- The reading passage states that humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding or mating purposes and they have ability to navigate by stars However the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading 76
- do you agree or disagree with that television advertising towards children should not be allowed 70
- Problems with writer s explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...gard, most peoples opinions are divided as to whether it is right to point out a mistake or n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...r but also has a negative impact on the peoples judgment about talk. I will have to adm...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fluenced by my own personal experience. When I was a teenager I participated in the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he speaker was moving the topic forward, I suddenly interrupt and presented a not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, then, as to, i think, as a result, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68181818182 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6747547582 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542613636364 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4495683544 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163758225175 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509478955239 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865613367698 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134146050694 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125111551763 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.