Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No person on this earth is perfect. Even since the ancient time, the students are always in favor of teachers rather than parents. Committing mistakes doesn't prove the teachers are always illustrating students on the wrong things. After all, every individual is a student when it comes to the infinite knowledge of the universe. In my opinion, waiting till the class is completed and also after students leaving the classroom is always better to correct a wrong notion of a teacher. I will be explaining my preferred options hereunder.
To begin with, waiting till the class is discharged is a better idea because that prevents from creating a disturbance in the class who are concentrating keenly on the subject. By doing this way, the teachers can also research the topic and can make themselves correct in the next class. On the other hand, there are some people who always argue that mistakes should be correct whenever they got caught. Thus helps them from illustrating their minds in the wrong way. For instance, when I was in dental school, my professor taught the wrong sentence in one of her classes. As soon as I noticed, I made a note and waited until the class gets dismissed. Later, I went to the professor and told that one of the sentences was wrongly said by her. She was amused because she didn't notice that and appreciated me for bringing to her notice. Very next day she corrected the sentence and explained in an entertaining way about that topic. By this, we can assume that even expressing the wrong things said by the teacher can be corrected after her class is done.
Furthermore, if we talk after the class it shows respect not only towards the teacher but also to her profession. This creates a good impression towards particular students and the teachers will be always willing to help the students even more. On the contrary, there are students who don't care about the teacher's dignity nor their profession. Those people always want to make fun in front of everyone. Additionally, they would wait for that opportunity to hit. I am going to illustrate one of my personal experiences. When I was playing tennis, one of my coaches taught me a trick to divert the opponent's attention. But eventually, it went wrong. Even though I went to my coach and said the correct thing that we should do after my match, then the coach was impressed and paid gratitude by paying for my lunch. This clearly depicts that shooting mistakes after everyone is done with their things shows respect for the teachers we follow.
All in all, I vehemently assert that speaking of teacher's mistakes after the class is finished is always a better thing. This not only prevents disturbing the students in class but also it pays respect towards their profession.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- burning mirror 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees in the 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ather than parents. Committing mistakes doesnt prove the teachers are always illustrat...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...said by her. She was amused because she didnt notice that and appreciated me for brin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 891, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an entertaining way" with adverb for "entertaining"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he corrected the sentence and explained in an entertaining way about that topic. By this, we can assum...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...On the contrary, there are students who dont care about the teachers dignity nor the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...re are students who dont care about the teachers dignity nor their profession. Those peo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opponents'' or 'opponent's'?
Suggestion: opponents'; opponent's
...coaches taught me a trick to divert the opponents attention. But eventually, it went wron...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, thus, after all, for instance, speaking of, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79707112971 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58383446097 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47489539749 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0463796203 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8928571429 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0714285714 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132287655936 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03787375469 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410054874302 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923979323592 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00949469148646 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.