Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
There are various different strangies that one can preform when he faces on some clearly mistakes made by the conference leaders or teachers. Some argue that one should interrept and correct the mistake right away or just keep slience. However, I prefer to wait until the class is over, and seek for further discussion about that mistake with that professior personally.
First of all, it would be helpful for students to organise and develop their core points if they have longer time to comprehensively think about one concept. Simplly interrept the professor right away, however, may cause unexceptional results. Many students are just catch the occional mind spark but have none of fully understand the further meaning behind its surface. Therefore, a general scenario is that when students interrept the professior's teaching, the whole class are experience a period of additional time to wait for that student to slowly express his opinion. Even if the student is correct, this behavior would lead to a huge of the teaching time. However, this negitave could be avoid if students choose to talk with the professor after class, since they are allowed to use longer time to make a , write down the specific problem, and have a further and more unambigious discussion with the professior.
Moreover,
To sum up, I believe that keep silence during the meeting and find further discussion with the professior is a better approach under this scenario.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 76
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 78
- A fake silver coin 83
- Powered flight of Pterosaurs 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
... are allowed to use longer time to make a , write down the specific problem, and ha...
^^^
Line 3, column 812, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...are allowed to use longer time to make a , write down the specific problem, and ha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 238.0 407.700716846 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13865546218 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6300324674 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613445378151 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7551967783 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0278133929062 0.236089414692 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0113337750706 0.076458572812 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191400101818 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0284497366718 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227989960005 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.