Imagine you could improve the town where you live by changing one important thing about it. Which of the following would you choose to do?
Build additional parks
Construct more libraries
Improve public transportation
Improving the towns and cities is a substantial matter for whole governments. Authorities take different measures to make a town a better place for living such as construction of new libraries, build parks or improving the public transportation. When it comes to me, it is my firm conviction that the benefits of a well-developed public transportation system are more than other advances. To support my idea, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be aptly explored in the following.
First and foremost, public transportation has a direct effect on our surrounding environment. Air pollution, water pollution and noise pollution originate from overutilizing of personal vehicles such as motor cycles and cars. In order to illuminate this subject, I explain an example. It goes without saying that cars and motorcycles are operated with fossil fuels. Burning of fossil fuels release a great amount of toxic gases into the atmosphere and these gases cause numerous death-leading diseases or at least breathing difficulties. As a result, by providing a suitable and efficient public transportation system, people will be promoted to leave their personal vehicles. Therefore, one important aspect of town, which is being healthy, is enhanced.
The second reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is rooted in the fact that, nowadays people are under great amount of pressures and tension. They have a very hectic daily schedule. Therefore, they set a lot of plans and it is very important for them to adhere their program and their daily time table. However, there is a big problem in front of them called dense traffics. For instance, some people have decided to study in conjunction with their occupation. Thus they are required to attend their classes and their workplace alternately. Needless to say, It is not possible in the dense traffic. By exploiting a well-developed public transportation, people will be able to adhere their programs. Consequently, the town is a better place for living and promotion.
In brief, I believe that developing an efficient public transportation system is the best approach to improve a town. Since, Not only people will have a clean environment to exploit but also that will be able to adhere their daily plans.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there’s no need for the government to help them. 70
- Some people think that older children should be required to take care of the younger children. Others think that this should be done by parents or other adults. Which do you prefer? 76
- tpo-42-Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Tpo 25electicity cylinder 80
- professors in the television 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...enhanced. The second reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is rooted in the fact tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y in conjunction with their occupation. Thus they are required to attend their class...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, at least, for instance, in brief, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21253405995 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06697749045 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577656675749 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2603077394 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9545454545 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6818181818 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133692490726 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389059181162 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527719487611 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0916661646452 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571620925135 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.