It goes without saying that in such a sophisticated world where the technology growing so fast that it could hardly be believed the individual become successful without taking different risks. However, some people may hold the view that gradual and safe working will give rise to better conclusions. From my vantage point, there are some exquisite advantages to illustrate the importance of working quickly and try a new experience. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which will aptly elucidate my viewpoint.
First and foremost, without a shadow of a doubt, the people who are brave enough to examine distinctive and unexplored things will definitely become more prosperous. Moreover, in the modern era, technology development is growing dramatically; thus, doing jobs slowly, have no reasonable reason. In other words, if individuals accomplish their task extremely conservative and hold the traditional attitudes, surely it will be left from the other competitors. The investigations recently have been shown that the rate of success among people who work fast and encounter making mistakes is significantly higher than those who do not experience them.
Another reason which deserves some words here is concerned with this issue that human beings will attain essential abilities through their diverse experiences. In terms of psychological, the individual progresses straightly depend on trying different risks, since, it is a great opportunity to learn vital lessons by doing them. Additionally, it is established beyond doubt that we will grasp the enjoyment of success as long as we have tasted the favor of failure.
To put it briefly, all the grounds as mentioned above lead us to the conclusion that the braveness of taking different risks in our tasks is one of the most critical factors of prosperity in today's world. In such a situation, we could enhance our talents. Furthermore, the quickness of accomplishing the work is directly considered in the rate of success. Consequently, it is highly recommended that people should not scare experience unusual things in order to provide a proper field to their accomplishments.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It's a waste of money for Government to fund space travel or space exploration. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 22 Integrated Writing Task 45
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39473684211 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07449570718 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622807017544 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.161205293 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134751664835 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041299052935 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605838316439 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714991288409 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452114207283 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.