The economic development of countries, it is a fact that cannot be detained by anyone. In fact, those countries that don't develop in the same pace as the rest of the world are considered "Third world countries". This is an interesting topic that will divide people because each person will provide a different opinion. Nevertheless, when it comes to me, I outright consider that undoubtedly the government should pay attention to the economic development based on some reasons.
To begin with, the word "Economic development" encompasses a bunch of fields that should not be neglected by the government. Scientists are concurred that if the country doesn't produce enough money, it won't be able to compete with other countries of the region. Therefore, students won't have an education with quality, people will live much less, and even environmental problems cannot be solved. Let's make a brief explanation about that. Canada is a good quotation due to the fact that the government has focused on industries, as a result the fields mentioned above have developed as well. Moreover, the government has destined resources to environmentally politics design to protect the trees. otherwise, it wouldn't be able to do it.
Another noteworthy aspect is that to focus on the economy doesn't means that the environment will be damaged. The most conspicuous aspect about capitalism is that enough resources are produced to develop environmentally friendly projects. Let me shed light on my point. The use of panels in order to take advantage from the sun as a source of energy for millions of people in the United States is the most innovative and even healthy invention. For instance, with the use of this method, millions of trees can be preserved, thus protecting and preserving the houses of animals' species that live in those areas.
In addition, the economic development has also given the opportunity to find the cure to deadly diseases. Thanks to the funds donated by the government, universities have found treatment that can treat and even cure illness such as cancer and some virus like AIDS. So, one can conclude that money improve people's live.
To sum up, I consider that the government should focus on the economic development more than any other thing because in this way more than one field might be developed, environmentally friendly politics can be created and finally more diseases can be cured.
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown,what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples tosupport your answer 50
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people are now less happy and less satisfy with their lives than people were in the past.Agree or disagree? 70
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay 70
- TOPIC # 42 What is very important skill a person should learn in order to be successful in the world today? Choose one skill and use specific reasons... 70
- You have decided to give several hours of your time each month to improve the community where you live. What is one thing you will do to improve your community? Why? Use pecific reasons and details to explain your choice. 85
government has destined resources to environmentally politics design to protect the trees
government has destined resources to environmentally politics designed to protect the trees
government has destined resources to environmentally politics which are designed to protect the trees
flaws:
No. of Words: 402 while No. of Different Words: 209
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 402 350
No. of Characters: 1970 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.478 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.9 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.805 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 104 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.158 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.604 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.281 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.509 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.048 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5