Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that inherit talents play only a partially role on determining progress and performance of people. There are variety of factors involve in success of people in each career. Contrary to this popular belief there are still those who argue that leadership required specific qualities which their basis should present in person naturally. However, I to a great extent disagree with this idea that leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
First and foremost, experience is the most important factor that make people a good leader. For example, in football teams always the elder player has the position of leading other group's members. It is because during time they interact with different difficult situations which provide them enough knowledge and patience to have the ability of make true decisions at the time of problems and have control on stressful conditions. When the younger members lose their self-confidence and hope the captain assist them to recover from unfortunate feelings.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that anyone cannot be an extraordinary leader without an appropriate training. Today, most people who govern important and sensitive professions should be passed a lot of academic degrees and tests. Obviously, no one do not puts in charge of guiding Crisis Management Organization just based on his/her genetically intelligence. Now, there are a range of degrees at universities that specificly focus on particular organization skills in order to provide capable experts in each fields.
Finally, yet importantly, it is true that some people inherently have higher potential on managing and supervising a group, nonetheless, even the most brilliant minds will be faded if do not receive a proper education. Moreover, if exceptional gifted people do not grow in true way, it can be resulted a huge disaster for society. For example, Hitler the famous German leader who created one of the most troubling time for human kind.
On the basis of the reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that leadership do not just naturally. It is because of the important role of experience and training on elaborating experts and because
- TPO 30 80
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 90
- TPO-54#LECTUREThe Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being 76
- TPO 26 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('partially') instead an adjective, or a noun ('role') instead of another adjective.
...accepted that inherit talents play only a partially role on determining progress and performance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'put'?
Suggestion: put
...ees and tests. Obviously, no one do not puts in charge of guiding Crisis Management ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, for example, it is true, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32212885154 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89239525337 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1121346132 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.764705882 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28264404095 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785209214534 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141105064265 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138697416844 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110452633992 0.0645574589148 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.