Nowadays children confront different sources that can influence their behavior in an unproductive way. Adults should take actions to protect their children from situations where taught them misbehavior. I believe the first step to do it is to monitor them closely while they are playing with their friends. Close supervision helps parents understand the issue better and therefore find out the underlying cause. And then, they can take action based on the underlying cause to change their behavior.
Observing children while they are playing is an effective way to understand them better. Children act differently when they are playing with their friends. They act honest and more natural while playing, whereas they show some shift in their attitudes when they face an adult. Observing them in this periods can help adults figure out whether adults themselves caused this misbehaving. However, if the monitoring shows that the child behavior is consistent, then parents can search for other problems or diseases like hyper-activity that needs a professionals assistant. Monitoring can also reveal if games or friends caused this situation. As a result, adults can limit their child friends or ask them not to play a certain kind of games. Parents can also inform other parents about their child situation and explain how they can face this together.
After understanding misbehavior origin, parents should take action to save their children from further harm and misconducting. Several options are available based on the result of monitoring. Some parents may find out that child's friends or games caused the problem, as stated before, in this case, they can limit their friends or prohibit problematic games, respectively. To avoid harming children's feelings, adults should provide situations in which he or she can find a better friend or offer him/her a suitable game. However, if they find out that the child behavior is consistent they should talk with a Trappist first. In most cases, adults behavior themselves caused the problem, so they are the ones who should have therapy sessions. Otherwise, children should be checked by Trappist closely.
In sum, children's misbehavior might be caused from different sources and observing children while they are playing is a key move to find the underlying cause. Thereafter, knowing the cause, it is easier for adults to find a proper solution. Despite the solutions discussed here, a profound action the adults can take is consulting a professional Trappist or psychologist.
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 65
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree. 76
- TPO 30 Integrated 83
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unproductive way" with adverb for "unproductive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...urces that can influence their behavior in an unproductive way. Adults should take actions to protect ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n they face an adult. Observing them in this periods can help adults figure out whet...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, kind of, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3375 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7309236075 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4975 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3667822094 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8260869565 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3913043478 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47826086957 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372572635949 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123642764157 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112770470221 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246884957701 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562111689202 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.