Nowadays children encounter different origins that can affect their behavior unproductively. Adults should make efforts to protect their children from situations where it can taught them misbehavior. I believe the initial step is to oversee them closely while they are playing with their friends. Close supervision helps parents recognize the issue better and accordingly find out the dominating source. And then, they can take action based on the underlying cause to change their behavior.
Observing children while they are playing is an effective way to understand them better. Children act differently when they are playing with their friends. They act honest and more natural while playing, whereas they show some shift in their attitudes when they face an adult. Observing them in this periods can help adults figure out whether adults themselves caused this misbehaving. However, if the tracking shows that the child behavior is consistent, then parents can look for other problems or diseases like hyper-activity that needs a professionals assistant. Monitoring can also reveal if games or friends caused this situation. As a result, adults can limit their child friends or ask them not to play a certain kind of games. Parents can also inform other parents about their child situation and manage this situation jointly.
After understanding misbehavior origin, parents should move forward to save their children from further harm and misconducting. Several options are available based on the result of monitoring. Some parents may find out that child's friends or games caused the problem, as expressed before, in this state, they can limit their friends or prohibit problematic games, respectively. To avoid harming children's feelings, adults should provide situations in which he or she can find a better friend or offer him/her a suitable game. However, if they find out that the child behavior is consistent they should talk with a Trappist first. In most cases, adults behavior themselves caused the problem, so they are the ones who should have therapy sessions. Otherwise, children should be tested by Trappist closely.
In sum, children's misconduct might be caused from various sources and examining children while they are playing is a key move to find the underlying cause. Thereafter, knowing the cause, it is easier for adults to find a proper solution. Despite the solutions considered here, an intelligent action the adults can take is consulting a professional Trappist or psychologist.
- Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 70
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to help their communities. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 75
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'teach'
Suggestion: teach
...r children from situations where it can taught them misbehavior. I believe the initial...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n they face an adult. Observing them in this periods can help adults figure out whet...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, however, if, look, may, so, then, whereas, while, kind of, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 389.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49357326478 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01099506632 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529562982005 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5681458511 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9130434783 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9130434783 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352630481003 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113976627696 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105884583019 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224326085693 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575900240397 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.