The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity.
It is generally agreed today that give money to poor people has played a pivotal role in reducing the poverty in society to prepare the good life for all. Due to its paramount importance, there is a long-standing discussion among people that whether these days helping poor people is a value, but Some rich people are inclined toward the attitude that nowadays give their money to charities or not. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent on the belief that, rich people should not give their money to charities. In the ensuing paragraphs, I will represent cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justify the thesis is that everyone who has extra money should help in creating jobs for poor people, instead give money to the charities edifies. To put it in general words, rich people can gather their money and construct a factory for poor people. Simply stated, the poor people could gain money by their work and be independent in financial issues. Needless to say, with this strategy, poverty will eliminate in cities or countries. To shed more light on the issue, according to a study conducted in my country recently reveals that poverty decrease 20% in ten years by using this policy.
Alongside with the first reason elaborated above, another equally noteworthy in corroborating my stance is that the poor people should train to find a job by the money of rich people. To clarify, a Chinese proverb expresses that," give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime". To delineate, the establishment of edifies to learn some specific job or specialize for poor people to find a proper job with this expert. For instance, they can learn mechanical, electrical, cooking to forth and use these professions. However, what I mentioned above might not be overgeneralized to all contexts. Many people who had extra money prefer to give their money to charities rather than to help directly to poor people.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions, which are excluded from the general rules. I do agree that rich people should not give their money to charities. However, that was the story in a nutshell. In fact, there is a myriad of other reasons, challenging the above claim, which could be mentioned but is not embraced due to the dearth of time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | mrhj75 | 75 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | abusrddddd | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-19 | Rustin_Panda | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | reeya kiran | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 70
- Should government spend money on public parks for everyone or build a sport field for students 76
- People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meet 86
- In order to be successful, businesses must put more money in advertising 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...larify, a Chinese proverb expresses that,' give a man a fish and you feed him for...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, for instance, in fact, in general, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78959810875 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67319966645 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505910165485 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0814751734 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.631578947 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249977264198 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739944303145 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692319061697 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154272546515 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397867419285 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.