Usually, in all schools, teachers provide different tasks where students must work as a team. Later, all students are graded for their performance on their project work. In this regard, some people think that receiving an equivalent score is the best approach in group projects, while others hold a different opinion that students must need to get their score separately for their projects. From my perspective, the latter view carries more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that considering one grade for all students undermine their educational ability, and students might have to pay a huge cost due to this method. Needless to say, working with the same level students would help to maintain a stimulating environment among all. To elaborate this more, if the grades are given equivalently to all students, then the one who has no incentive to work on a project might get a higher grade since having a high achiever as a teammate. Accordingly, the students who work hard for a project might get discouraged as they will not be rewarded separately for their achievements and hard work. Consequently, the high achiever may not put in an effort due to having a fear of not getting appreciation from their teachers. Hence, gradually and slowly, it could badly affect their academic performance level.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is that looking at this scenario from another side when students are graded individually on performing for a group task, it is more likely that they would start participating more enthusiastically and efficiently. Additionally, they will try to put propose their ideas and opinions, whereby the outcome of the whole project would be great, and on top of that, it gives an opportunity to other students to grasp a wide horizon of knowledge from them. On the contrary, the students who are not graded separately may feel lazy, and not motivated enough to perform a task. Take my own personal experience as an example of this. When I was a sophomore at university, we supposed to construct a model of human anatomy in biology class. Students were divided into small groups. It is a fact that every student devoted a lot of their time behind this task in order to make it remarkable from others, from which, students can gain extra credits. I personally would have learned many theoretical strategies and real practical experience after participating in that group project.
Lastly, having discussed the issue from this point of view, I rather look into it from another standpoint. Admittedly, there are evident benefits when students get evaluated for their group tasks, however, it could have some negative effects too. Sometimes, schools and teachers give too much emphasis on getting higher grades through group performance. Unfortunately, in this case, students might be stressed out and wasted a lot of their precious time to gain higher points. As a result, they cannot focus on other important subjects which need to be studied with equal importance.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that students need to be graded separately in order to enhance their educational performance. This is because it helps them to maintain their enthusiasm and motivation.
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Do you agree or disagree 90
- TPO 43 integrated writing 70
- TPO 11 Integrated Writing Task 70
- integrated tpo 26 80
- TPO 23 Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er participating in that group project. Lastly, having discussed the issue from ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, so, then, thus, while, as a result, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2785.0 1977.66487455 141% => OK
No of words: 546.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10073260073 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83390555256 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8286720147 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520146520147 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9864641875 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.115384615 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214038080415 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619153600573 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575137883832 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127754594502 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254589574434 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 86.8835125448 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.