Without a shadow of a doubt, accomplished and talented individuals are of the essence, especially when it comes to going toward a flourishing society. An unanswered question in this area is whether allocating public funding to upgrade young adults' skills is economically efficient. Although some arguments assert that government should not involve in these programs and let people realize what skills are required for their occupations, I believe otherwise, maintaining that governments should provide enough money to update job-related skills. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is improving prospective job candidates’ skills prevents squandering time and money. Whether in public sectors or private sectors, many incompetent staff waste financial resources. Even though these people have strong credentials, their knowledge is obsolete due to the sharp growth of technology. Some giant corporations have held training classes for both experienced and new employees annually, and they could increase the productivity and performance of their clerks. Also, they satisfied their customers and won the business competition. If the government widely implements the same policy, the country’s economy will thrive and increase the quality of life in the light of economic growth.
Another reason to be mentioned is that those people who are familiar with technology are less likely to struggle with their children. Given the necessity of nascent technologies like social media and the Internet in daily life, children easily access them and are vulnerable to their adverse effects. If parents protect their kids from the dark side of the Internet and social media, they will expose to inappropriate age-contend. As a result, juvenile delinquency and anti-social behavior will be increased in society. If governments improve the technology-based knowledge of future parents, they will monitor their children appropriately, so government decreases their expenditure on dealing with crimes and illegal activities. Additionally, teaching these skills to their children reduces government spending on education. For example, had I not acquired computer skills, I would have faced a challenge for my kid’s education during Covid-19.
Reflecting upon the grounds mentioned above, one soon realizes government should spare no expense in teaching modern skills nor begrudge any penny spent.
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when they cau 76
- Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books When a movie is based on a book some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie Which do you prefer and why 83
- Are government doing good in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating 67
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8027027027 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04931586527 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3600479565 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.277777778 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145734184927 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415026576488 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439413719456 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091594973479 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01354392886 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.