In order to attract more tourists, the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets. Which way do you think is more effective?
With the development of technology, people can travel around the world easily, and more places relay on tourists for a living. In my opinion, if a country wants to attract more tourists, the government should spend more budget on the appearance of the buildings and the streets. There are two reasons why I feel this way, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, most people like to take pictures when they are traveling, and thus it is important for them to visit good-looking places. Besides this, lots of people today are passionate about social media and used to share their lives on different social platforms. Consider celebrities, for instance. They usually post beautiful photos of themselves on Instagram to tell everyone they have been many places overseas. This is not only for showing off but attract more people to follow them and earn money by their popularities. That is the reason why those people care about the appearance of a city. In short, repairing old buildings and streets is actually useful to make a city appeal to more people to visit.
Moreover, although it is true that the police or securities standing at famous viewpoints can make sure visitors’ safety, people’s willingness to go there may decrease since people may think there is something terrible happened, or they may feel pressure while they are sightseeing. Further, it is for sure that rebuilding old construction and clean the streets can increase the number of tourists since it is safer and tidy. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I traveled to Europe, I was used to comparing different cities I have been to. I was surprised at the homeless people and dirty streets in Budapest after being in Vienna. The roads in Vienna was not messy at all, and I felt comfortable while I was strolling in the city. In addition, if someone asks my recommendation about which city or viewpoint should go, I will choose Vienna. Therefore, there is no doubt that maintaining the appearance of a city can attract more visitors.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that keeping a place clean and make it looks new can definitely attract more travelers effectively. This is because people take pictures and like to show off how they enjoy the lives. Additionally, most people prefer to have a trip to a clean, tidy place instead of a messy place.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Overall the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today s world Use reasons and details to support your opinion 83
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 80
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are now easier to become educated than in the past 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86532951289 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74045663062 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547277936963 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8091848262 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197497500816 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638807069707 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882786093445 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13428942568 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908015912263 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.