Information is very important for a person who wants to be well-informed. Getting better information from valid resources is necessary to reach this goal. Some people think that In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources, others disagree. In my view, it is better to earn information from old and authentic resources for two main reasons.
First, new resources are not much reliable. It is true that some new resources have good and new information, but getting information from old and reliable resources is a safe way to access authentic data. For example, last semester I worked on a Control Project Systems and as you can expect, I search on the internet and found a lot of information. I gathered and processed the data and make charts and went to my professors' office. After I turned in the paper, the professor stated that those kind of data were unrealistic and did not accept the paper. I started to gather information again, but on reliable sites and books. This experience taught me that, it is better to gain information from authentic resources.
Second, It is better to read an authentic book twice rather than search for new information. If you can master in one subject, you would claim that you are well-informed at least in one subject. For instance, I study industrial engineering and I try to complete my paper about factory designing. In order to master on that subject, I study a variety of books. But when I consulting with my professor, he gave me important advice. He said that study just two important books about that issue and repeat studying for ten times and you are going to mastering on that issue. From this, I learn that It is better to read an authentic book twice rather than search for new information.
In sum, I think it is better to earn information from old and authentic resources, not only new resources are not much reliable, but buy also It is better to read an authentic book twice rather than search for new information. Therefore, all of us must try to gather valid information.
- Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees. Through genetic modification, it is possible to create trees that produce more fruits, grow faster, or withstand advers 60
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insects. Unfortunately, the toad 76
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 76
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...med, a person must get information from many different news resources, others disagree. In my ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
...in the paper, the professor stated that those kind of data were unrealistic and did not ac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...t, I study a variety of books. But when I consulting with my professor, he gave m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, at least, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79501385042 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83701411785 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468144044321 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4928909574 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.05 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239691696523 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807803105322 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13559419097 0.0737576698707 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177532719841 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187034627578 0.0645574589148 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.