Since the dawn of civilization hitherto, the food has been crucial to our survival, and people’s health strongly depends on what they eat. A considerable number of people believe that what we eat is healthier than before. However, I am highly inclined to believe that our food is not as healthy as what our ancestors were in the past, and today’s food is regarded as thoroughly both destructive and negative due to the fact that most types of commonly consumed foods today are preprocessed. Moreover, having less time to cook a meal, people consume more fast food. So, accompany me and Follow illustrations to demonstrate my idea.
One of the imperative reason is what we eat as food today and called preprocessed food. It is alternatively stated that most diets being taken by people have already suffered from various adverse alteration. Clearly, these types of foods are faced with a seeable reformation such as enhancing additives for conservation or creating artificial tastes, which consequently reduce the quality of the food. Although additives have been qualified by healthcare organizations, there have always been debates about how some specific type of these additives, which had not been considered as hazardous, was actually harmful. From my own experience in my childhood, the only type of meat that has been achievable to eat was fresh and unprocessed meat provided with the butchery, contrary to what we eat as meat today. This can vary from hamburger to sausages and many other types of meat with a specific type of artificial taste that had been widely used in nectars and drinks. Therefore, adding additives and preprocessing foods has decreased their quality, and was proved to increase the chance of cancer.
Besides, it is undeniable that spending a lot of time in the traffic jam and at work, lessen people’s tendency to spend much time on cooking. Thus, eating fast food in addition to the unacceptable nutritional habit has been drastically increasing during the last decades. The Latest studies conducted by Sharif University have revealed that eating fast food frequently can pessimistically result in serious well-being issues such as cancer and optimistically leads to obesity, mostly due to the oil which fast food is fried in. Additionally, nutritionists always talk about how obesity not only increases the possibility of many disorders, such as heart attack, it inevitably leads to high blood pressure as well. For instance, a friend of mine who used to eat fast food on a regular basis had been suffering from obesity and now, after 20 years, is struggling with high blood pressure. Hence, eating fast foods can potentially impose irreparable impacts on people’s health in the long run.
In conclusion, weighing all arguments up against each other, what we consume as food today is getting increasingly less healthy. That’s mostly due to the preprocessed food ingredients that we use in cooking, as well as the huge amount of fast food we eat today. Consequently, I suggest that we should take some steps back and make some change in our diet. It seems that the best way is the most natural way, and the most natural way is the way our ancestors took.
- The aim of education? 90
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today. 3 70
- Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation? 86
- In the past people ate food that was better for their health than they do today 67
- today's food and the past foods pros and cons. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 529.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08884688091 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92589130104 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533081285444 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 833.4 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7857773967 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.363636364 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0454545455 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164429050057 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540904106278 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422369432885 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106221798821 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439360505049 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.